By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Mafia Round 74 -Overwatch Theme

Linkzmax said:
miz1q2w3e said:

So, you say you know that you were tagerted, but don't claim bulletproof.

Furthermore, you insta-vote Darwin, with no explanation. Why is he confirm mafia from your point of view?

The darwin vote is explained by most of prof's Day 1 posts. He heavily suspected darwin, but knew the lynch was unlikely due to many of us having a stance against lynching rookies Day 1. This has been said once or twice before already.

I'm gonna wait to him to reply before I comment on this.



Around the Network

As has been said, I wanted to lynch darwin yesterday. I spent half the day about it, and asked for support from many players who declined saying that they didn't want to lynch a newbie on day 1.

I even said at the end of yesterday, whoever is alive, look at darwin and stefl.
It's now day 2.



miz1q2w3e said:
Stefl1504 said:

So you claim bulletproof self-potato (not really a watcher, but nerfed watcher, you just get to know when you got de-bulletproofed or so) and didn't go after a bulletproof claim yesterday O_o?

This question, so much...

There is no need for now to delve too hard into role specifics, I have enough to think that it is unlikely for prof and mr.p both being town. I am still would like to know if this was a gambit though.

Linkzmax said:
Stefl1504 said:

So you claim bulletproof self-potato (not really a watcher, but nerfed watcher, you just get to know when you got de-bulletproofed or so) and didn't go after a bulletproof claim yesterday O_o?

Well, I don't know really, you might be onto something with clyde, my first thought was you have to be lying with the mentioned above - but clyde instantly drew from it that there is an sk...

With ^that being said. Stefl is probably onto something. First inclination should be to doubt your claim, but Clyde sees it as a possibility for two BPs. Bonus connection info: A mafia Clyde would suggest town Mr.P.

Can you elaborate why you think it would suggest town mr.p, am I missing something? Clyde even unvoted Mr.P over the last few minutes(hours?) of day 1, actually causing the draw, to me would that hint towards them actually being both mafia.



I actually like stefl's response to the series of events the best. I no longer suspect him.



theprof00 said:
As has been said, I wanted to lynch darwin yesterday. I spent half the day about it, and asked for support from many players who declined saying that they didn't want to lynch a newbie on day 1.

I even said at the end of yesterday, whoever is alive, look at darwin and stefl.
It's now day 2.

Ok. I asked because the way you wrote that, it seemed there was causation/correlation.

So, what about the part about how you may or may not be bulletproof? Why didn't you go after Mr.P? From your point of view, he is extremely suspicious.



Around the Network

Enough has already been given away, but again I'll repeat that I'm not bulletproof.



And again, like I said yesterday, it's not that I don't doubt that mrp might be mafia bp.
But I play by analyzing behavior, not meta. Me thinking that mrp makes sense as a mafia bp doesn't influence my decision on whether I trust him or not.



theprof00 said:
Enough has already been given away, but again I'll repeat that I'm not bulletproof.

No, it hasn't. This is extremely confusing and it feels deliberately vague, and I FoS you for it.

You've already claimed PR. What else could there possibly be that you can't say?

Do you know who targeted you? Why are you alive, if you're not BP? This doesn't make any sense to me.



Stefl1504 said:
Linkzmax said:

With ^that being said. Stefl is probably onto something. First inclination should be to doubt your claim, but Clyde sees it as a possibility for two BPs. Bonus connection info: A mafia Clyde would suggest town Mr.P.

Can you elaborate why you think it would suggest town mr.p, am I missing something? Clyde even unvoted Mr.P over the last few minutes(hours?) of day 1, actually causing the draw, to me would that hint towards them actually being both mafia.

I guess you're right. I was looking at it moreso that not questioning prof means he believes the claim on top of believing Mr.P's. Wasn't thinking of it from the angle that doubting prof's would mean he should also throw shade at Mr.P, getting the latter in hot water again.



miz1q2w3e said:
theprof00 said:
Enough has already been given away, but again I'll repeat that I'm not bulletproof.

No, it hasn't. This is extremely confusing and it feels deliberately vague, and I FoS you for it.

You've already claimed PR. What else could there possibly be that you can't say?

Do you know who targeted you? Why are you alive, if you're not BP? This doesn't make any sense to me.

At this point I'd be rather suprised to face someone who straight out claims vanilla and yes, it has been enough role discussion. I am fine if you questioning his motivation to come out, the likelyhood of a role like his existing next to a bp, but you shouldn't push his claim now.