Linkzmax said: I find it weird that you urge a sense of caution for voting quickly and then do so yourself. |
Well, my vote makes everything level again...you still haven't said if you find his reasoning weird, btw.
Linkzmax said: I find it weird that you urge a sense of caution for voting quickly and then do so yourself. |
Well, my vote makes everything level again...you still haven't said if you find his reasoning weird, btw.
Linkzmax said: I find it weird that you urge a sense of caution for voting quickly and then do so yourself. |
Also jokes on you. I never cautioned that he's voting quickly, just that he's voting irresponsibly and using his gut. If he had a solid basis I'd be fine with his vote. There's no solid basis, though. He just voted for Noctis even though there are other people who are more deserving of said vote.
Linkzmax said:
I think it's quite naive to think Mr.P, if mafia again, would play as defensively as he did last game with so many of the same players. Yet prof pointed that out as a defense for him, and it was enough for you to unvote. So what are your thoughts on prof, and why the FoS on darwin? |
I usually reserve a FoS to someone I get a vibe from. HoS when I get something a bit more, and a vote for when there's definitely something to be found from that player.
I think Prof is a very hard player to read. He's either a huge boon or a huge bane to the town. I will say that for how much he was throwing dirt on to Darwin, he didn't really cast a vote to seal the deal.
Mr.Playstation said:
Vote: Stefl Its day two, you can't just go around voting with your gut anymore. He never really tied the vote, he just voted and then things happened (Clyde unvoted, Prof voted Spurge, Final Fan voted for me and so on...). |
Actually I don't think there ever stops being a good time to throw votes, so long as they are within reason. Sometimes the best way to get information is to apply pressure.
Clyde32 said:
Actually I don't think there ever stops being a good time to throw votes, so long as they are within reason. Sometimes the best way to get information is to apply pressure. |
All it does is create a lynch train which is irresponsible for a townie to do (Without basis) on day 2. We have two less town men implying that the effect mafia have today is much higher than it was yesterday. All you need is one more confused townie to join in and mafia will have a field day.
Also no pressure town but we'll be in a bad position tomorrow if we miss lynch today.
Mr.Playstation said:
Also jokes on you. I never cautioned that he's voting quickly, just that he's voting irresponsibly and using his gut. If he had a solid basis I'd be fine with his vote. There's no solid basis, though. He just voted for Noctis even though there are other people who are more deserving of said vote. |
I don't find it weird as I have suspicions of Noctis myself. I'm glad that he's looking elsewhere instead of simply turning another Day into a topic of lynching you or not. Tunnelling against one person can be dangerous.
What is an irresponsible vote? Why can't we vote with our gut right now?
Mr.Playstation said:
All it does is create a lynch train which is irresponsible for a townie to do (Without basis) on day 2. We have two less town men implying that the effect mafia have today is much higher than it was yesterday. All you need is one more confused townie to join in and mafia will have a field day. Also no pressure town but we'll be in a bad position tomorrow if we miss lynch today. |
How exactly will a confused townie joining Stefl's lynchtrain that is without basis equate to a field day for mafia?
Stefl1504 said: also darwin to be scum (because of how he reacted to linkz QT poke, but that might just be due to him looking it up when he was asked bout it... still rubbed me the wrong way, he kinda seemed quite aware of it without much thought) |
Mind explaining this? I got the impression he wasn't aware of it nor looked it up.
Darwinianevolution said:
I didn't know it existed, why? It's some sort of automatic discussion board? |
Well, to answer linkz > he didn't know it existed, it is an automatic discussion board - to me that at least implies that he looked it up - and it kinda looked like feigning ignorance. I would've expected him to say something by the lines of a clear no if he trully was town. I didn't like that you baited him like that, since a careless answer by a noob towny might just as well fuck him up. He also didn't specify that he didn't know it up to this point... at best it is a slip, at worst it is just a careless, unclear answer.
Linkzmax said:
Mind explaining this? I got the impression he wasn't aware of it nor looked it up. |
Mr.Playstation said:
All it does is create a lynch train which is irresponsible for a townie to do (Without basis) on day 2. We have two less town men implying that the effect mafia have today is much higher than it was yesterday. All you need is one more confused townie to join in and mafia will have a field day. Also no pressure town but we'll be in a bad position tomorrow if we miss lynch today. |
If a lynch train starts there had better be enough to go on. Unless you have a bad town then the person with the initial accusation has to have a very good argument to convince everyone to jump on. If the lynchee flips town then the suspicion immediately falls on to the person who pushed for the lynch.
If a bandwagon starts without sufficient information then it's a good way to see who's willing to jump at the chance of a lynch.