Given the theme, I am thinking Vigilante is quite likely. But I don't believe a Town or Mafia BP would be included just for a Vigilante unless they have unlimited shots.

Drinkzmax shall return in a few hours, I hope some of you will be around then!

yeah i forgot that you don't like to lynch new people day 1. It's just to me, he's new, and I've seen the exact same kind of talk in mafia QTs of prof overanalyzes but he's trouble etc etc. I could probably pull up 3 or 4 instances of those exact words.

Just to be clear, I'm not saying we should cut him slack for the entire game, but for Day 1, when we have the worst information and when it is most sad to kill a new player. 

And yes, mafia that are town leaders are obviously more dangerous, but on the other hand mafia that talk a lot but aren't in a leadership position can end up being useful after the flip.  Really, I guess you could say that they are just anti-townies with equivalent negative value to townies' positive value who participate, give good input, etc.  Lurkers being the least positive or least negative, except that lurker townies can have negative value while lurker mafia don't have positive value.  So I guess the inversion would be either inexact or displaced along the axis. 

@Mr.P, I would also like to know the answers to these.

Also, I don't know if y'all missed it, but he also claimed D.Va. Any CC (counter claim) to this character? I know it's a long shot, not to mention theme-related, but I'm hoping to possibly catch him in a lie.

And to your left we can see Baalzamon fishing for Mr.P's role.

Oh, and did I mention he is the first person to even mention "bulletproof" (in the quoted post). Everything prior to this had pointed towards a double vote, based on Mr.P's wording. I'm pretty sure Baalzamon has an attacking power.

It's diiferent Linkz and you know it. If you look at this way. We will only lose one Town or none at all if ever there's a no Lynch.

The real game starts in Day 2 not Day one. I understand that lynching one could give us an info. but for me no lynch is to buy time. If ever there are power roles that can provide us info. the next day then that is awesome and we can go from there. If not then we can just based it from the Scum will kill.  Atleast we only lose 1 townie.

I am not saying that we don't  lynch if we have substantial evidence and there's a slip then let's push or it but lynching a random lurker because they are not posting a lot on day 1 is not good for me. IMO.

Fishing for his role? He said his 2 person comment, which essentially came off as a double voter. He was chastised for coming out with this info, and then he went further and more or less told us he was Bulletproof. Was I the first to say this? Absolutely, but it was far from hidden knowledge. I'm having a very difficult time seeing how my comments came across as fishing.

Just as Linkz mentioned I am not pushing for your lynch. I am pushing for a no lynch instead of lynching a lurker day 1. I am not really sure why you are acting this way though. It seems to me you are flailing scum by  doing this.

@ prof

1 thing I have noticed. Lynching a lurker will not provide information and no one will suspect them as scum because other townies are also pushing for it. Lurker flip town. Its like we are not going take it against them. It's like the safe lynch and push for those scums so I have 2 for this one I find scummy.

Spurge and FF and a little bit of Baalz.