By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Mafia Round 74 -Overwatch Theme

spurgeonryan said:
Was it astefl, I thought it was final faan or baalz?

Well, I was the first one to indirectly bring it up by trying to fetch Xander to activity (quite early into the game even). I didn't see any Baalz post encouraging lurkers lynches early.



Around the Network
Stefl1504 said:
spurgeonryan said:
Was it astefl, I thought it was final faan or baalz?

Well, I was the first one to indirectly bring it up by trying to fetch Xander to activity (quite early into the game even). I didn't see any Baalz post encouraging lurkers lynches early.

Ah, you probably meant the question if everybody checked in. Yeah, but that doesn't really count towards it.



My 2 cent on the matter on lynching lurkers on day 1.
It's a no no for me.

It won't give us a lot of info.

I would rather have a no lynch than lynching a lurker day 1.



Final-Fan said:
NoCtiS_NoX said:
I am still getting a bad vibe with Final-fan.
I can help it though and normally my instincts are correct.

@Final-fan..
It's funny though when Links is onto you, you quickly divert the attention onto somebody else.

So you think that BOTH Stefl and I are scum?  That's the only way to make sense of me downplaying my suspicion of Stefl and bringing up a lurker lynch (Xander) in response to Linkz's suspicion. 

P.S.  Were you on my nuts like this back when I played before?  I remember there was a guy who was unreasonably suspicious of me practically every game he was in, and I could be misremembering but you strongly remind me of him. 

Don't put words into my mouth. I did not said that you and stefl are both scum. If you are scum, it's one of the strategy you can use.  If ever Stefl got lynch and turns out to be town. It might put you in a good light and some of the people here will divert the attention unto other and put the pressure who is onto stefl.
I said it's all instinct and a hunch for now. I am actually admitting it right? If I am sure that you are scum then I will be pursuing a vote for you which I normally do when I know something is not right.

And yes I find it funny when you are trying to divert the attention into someone else. I am not sure if you are scared or whatnot.


Aand I remember those and you are not the only one. I always suspect Linkz and the others I cannot remember and most of the time my hunches are correct. I just cannot translate it into words. One of my weakness. Even if I found some evidence other just won't believe me.



NoCtiS_NoX said:
My 2 cent on the matter on lynching lurkers on day 1.
It's a no no for me.

It won't give us a lot of info.

I would rather have a no lynch than lynching a lurker day 1.

Well, there is a huge difference between mr.p and xander though. Though I agree that mr.p doesn't hold much info at this point, he seems really scummy with his reactions to linkz.

BTW, I think the 8 hours are over, still no explanation - and he seems all in on that xander lynch.

Vote: Mr.Playstation



Around the Network
miz1q2w3e said:
I'd like to add that: some votes are for reactions, some votes are based on scum feelings that fade, oftentimes new/better lynch candidates can emerge.

The only time I'd be concerned is when votes are baseless, or weakly based.

So where does your vote lies?  from what I understand, your vote to me is weak and baseless and I think you should be concerned about it right?

NoCtiS_NoX said:

Testing I am having a bad vibes from Finalfan. Just a heads up. I am sleeping when it gets busy here. Time Difference.

miz1q2w3e said:

One of spurge's comments made me look back and read around, and I found this^

I think I feel way better about voting Noctis than Stefl.

Vote: NoCtiS_NoX

I'd definitely appreciate some thoughts, though. I prefer Lynch to NL, and now I prefer Noctis to Stefl.

Linkzmax said:

Was it a specific comment from spurge that made you look at Noctis, or just caused you to reread?

Good find? Mind explaining or would you like Noctis to respond to your vote first?


I also need explanation for this? Please kindly explain?



Stefl1504 said:

Well, there is a huge difference between mr.p and xander though. Though I agree that mr.p doesn't hold much info at this point, he seems really scummy with his reactions to linkz.

BTW, I think the 8 hours are over, still no explanation - and he seems all in on that xander lynch.

Vote: Mr.Playstation

I am not still sure about MR. P that's why I am still on the fence. I don't how Mr P plays yet. I will take a time on rereading his post from this thread. I will start from there. I don't want to vote just for the sake of voting.

It seems we don't have a time limit yet. We can still find more meaningful post or hints who are the scums in here.




NoCtiS_NoX said:
Final-Fan said:

So you think that BOTH Stefl and I are scum?  That's the only way to make sense of me downplaying my suspicion of Stefl and bringing up a lurker lynch (Xander) in response to Linkz's suspicion. 

P.S.  Were you on my nuts like this back when I played before?  I remember there was a guy who was unreasonably suspicious of me practically every game he was in, and I could be misremembering but you strongly remind me of him. 

Don't put words into my mouth. I did not said that you and stefl are both scum. If you are scum, it's one of the strategy you can use.  If ever Stefl got lynch and turns out to be town. It might put you in a good light and some of the people here will divert the attention unto other and put the pressure who is onto stefl.
I said it's all instinct and a hunch for now. I am actually admitting it right? If I am sure that you are scum then I will be pursuing a vote for you which I normally do when I know something is not right.

And yes I find it funny when you are trying to divert the attention into someone else. I am not sure if you are scared or whatnot.


Aand I remember those and you are not the only one. I always suspect Linkz and the others I cannot remember and most of the time my hunches are correct. I just cannot translate it into words. One of my weakness. Even if I found some evidence other just won't believe me.

Instead of "think" I should have said "suspect".  Also, see my conversation with Linkz on this subject. 

P.S.  The way I remember it, you were wrong most of the time, at least when it came to me. 



Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom! 

Stefl1504 said:
NoCtiS_NoX said:
My 2 cent on the matter on lynching lurkers on day 1.
It's a no no for me.

It won't give us a lot of info.

I would rather have a no lynch than lynching a lurker day 1.

Well, there is a huge difference between mr.p and xander though. Though I agree that mr.p doesn't hold much info at this point, he seems really scummy with his reactions to linkz.

BTW, I think the 8 hours are over, still no explanation - and he seems all in on that xander lynch.

Vote: Mr.Playstation

I don't own you an explanation. The truth is town needs me 'cause I'm actually the equivalent of two town people. Also once Xander turns out Mafia, I'll be here with a big bag of told you so.



Send a Friend Request On PSN :P

Baalzamon said:
Vote: Time Limit

We are, quite frankly, further away from a vote now than we were 48 hours ago, with no sign of when this might change. For that matter, half of what I interpreted from the last 50 or so posts is talking about the previous game and doesn't even apply much to our current situation.

I still stand in that I agree a day 1 lynch can be a positive thing. I just think we need to come to a conclusion on whether we want to simply vote for a lurker or if we want to try agreeing on somebody scummy. I'd lean more towards the lurker side of things, as I've experienced games where they advance too far, and it halts the entire game. Not to mention the risk associated with a lurker mislynch is lower in my opinion because IF they were a townie, they clearly weren't going to be helping the town out much anyways.

I don't like the vote for a Time Limit when you don't even have a vote on someone. We might not be progressing very quickly, but it's not stagnant either. A Time Limit just causes a rush for a lynch that's usually less reasoned than otherwise.

NoCtiS_NoX said:
My 2 cent on the matter on lynching lurkers on day 1.
It's a no no for me.

It won't give us a lot of info.

I would rather have a no lynch than lynching a lurker day 1.

It is minimally informative, but I would agree with Baalz that lurkers are generally little help down the road and thus anti-town regardless of their actual faction.