Not american but if I were I would have voted for Trump, Since they are both threats in the role of President it's better for there to be someone that never had to do with politics since if he has to do s**t at least he'll need some time to learn how to mess up things, Hilary instead will be ready to ruin everything right away...

In all seriousness, I think the funnier interpretation is that candidate Trump doesn't trust his wife to vote for him. The more boring interpretation is that he was checking to see if she was done filling out the ballot so they could get the hell out of there.

Veknoid_Outcast said: Poliwrathlord said:   Click the map to create your own at 270toWin.com   According to the most recent polls from RCP this is what the electoral map could look like tonight (keep in mind that Trump is only up by .3 points in Florida so that could easily go blue before everything is said and done). I think NC and FL will go blue. The rest I agree with.

I don't.  The Mormons hate Trump so Utah might actually go with Clinton.  Clinton got a lot of endorsements in Arizona from papers that always endorsed Republicans till this year.  Will that matter in the end?  Probably not but I think that map is too generous to Trump in a few more states.  I can only pray that Ohio (the state I grew up in) doesn't go Trump.

It's not dangerous to be political incorrect and say what people really think?! YES it is! In this case, it really is! I agree with every one else that this "PC"-bullshit has gone too far, but some things you just don't say. Especially as apresidential candidate. Mexicans are rapist. Grabbing women by the pussy is ok. Having "strong leaders", such as dictators, is just fine. He's said a lot of stupid shit, which has made people act out their most inner desires; being bigots and more. Trump calling this election rigged has caused the right winged people to show up to election with guns asking people what they will vote for. No, Rol. What Trump has said has been dangerous. No matter what certain people think. Some times you gotta face these people and say that they are fucking wrong. YOU are wrong in this case. And we both know the foremost reason as to why millionaires and billioniares get away with not paying taxes; the republicans. It started with Reagen and his "trickle down economy", which didn't work.

He has said that he might not come to the aid of NATO members, if they were attacked by Russia. And I believe him, considering the close bonds they seem to share. That for one is a reason why Trump would be ddangerous to the world order we have. He's also said that "why don't Japan and Korea get nukes? why they rely on our nukes? Get yer own nukes". And that is a very dangerous mind set to have; allowing countries to get nukes! That creates an instable world. I don't even think he knows what he'd do if he WAS president, which is another dangferous thing to have! You don't want the most powerful man in the world not knowing what to do or how to do it. You don't even list any reasons as to why you don't think he'd use nukes or destabilize the world. But maybe it's not the world that would suffer the most, but minorities in the states. I also think he's against abortion. How can you possibly defend all of that?

I would love that if true. But I think AZ and UT are a little too far outside the margin of error. Ohio and Iowa could flip, but I'm not sure about AZ.

But if Clinton is actually around 3 points higher than her current polls, she could take AZ and maybe even something as exotic as Alaska.

Trump has not led Michigan once in the past four months of polling.
He doesn't have a prayer in Illinois and even his campaign would tell you that.
Whether you mean Washington DC or Washington State his odds in both are as bad as Illinois.

It's more likely, but still very unlikely, that Clinton would win Texas, Arizona, and Georgia than the predictions above.

I feel confident right now Clinton will win, and I'd be willing to make a wager on the outcome Rol.  Avatar for the month of November? 

If you don't know or understand how his statements have effected USA, maybe don't say it isn't dangerous then? He's openly MOCKED a handicapped journalist. Even if he did "marketing" half of the times, that would still leave him ignorant and dangerous would he become president. Some of the comments have lost him voters at times, so I don't think it's marketing at all. Most of the time it's just who he is.

For as long as Obama has been president the majority of congress have been republican, thus thwarting every attempt of raising taxes for the super rich. Warren Buffett (one of THE most richest man alive) even complained that he paid less % in taxes than his employees. I'm not sure if the super rich was taxed most during Bill Clinton's run as president (I'm guessing so, though), but this thought of "trickle down economy" became a fixation with the republicans, so when George HW Bush was elected he made damn sure the super rich had to pay waaaay less taxes. And like I said above, the republicans have pretty much refused to raise them again since.

I didn't ask you to defend Trump, I asked what made YOU belive all the things you've been saying. What makes you believe he's on amarketing campaign? He's said so many stupid things (alienating voters amongst them) that it all can't be marketing.

I don't follow baseball, so I'd shy away form that bet as well.

I was going to be nice by the way, give you a fine Austrian avatar. 

26x the debt Hillary's of Hillary's plan. I understand people don't want a your text book politician in office, but voting for Trump is like going to dentist to have open heart surgery. It's retarded. He's is so beyond clueless it's scary to think he could actually win. 

There's been several instances of that from what I've heard. I haven't heard of a democrat appearing threatening towards people, but that might be because I don't follow the "right channels".

Well, it explains why rich people isn't as heavily taxed as others.

So you don't believe he is this kind of person, not really? He's just acting up to get the attention and the votes?