By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Michael Pachter Thinks Lack Of 4K Blu-ray Not Important For PS4 Pro

SvennoJ said:
m_csquare said:

I can guarantee if you post this on any av forum, everyone will laugh at you.

 

4k and hdr are few features that you need to compare directly on TVs. You cant just use recordings or scrcaps to see the difference.

Or you could read some reviews from people who watch every quality aspect of a movie for a living.

One of if not the best 4K release so far:
http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Revenant-4K-Blu-ray/147639/
Does that really sound worth the upgrade, some differences in color grading. The praise for the blu-ray review outshines it (sounds like a bigger differene to the average blu-ray than this to it's 4K release)

And in their HDR reviews it's usually praise followed by stuff that actually looks worse than on blu-ray. This is what bly-ray.com said about Mad Max: Fury road
But the combination of HDR and enhanced resolution is not an unalloyed benefit. Anyone accustomed to watching classic films on Blu-ray should be familiar with the phenomenon in which such staples as matte paintings, rear projection and painted backdrops became obvious, sometimes distractingly so, with the increased sharpness and resolution of 1080p. Something similar happens with certain visual elements in Fury Road. The most common culprit is flame, which frequently accompanies the action, whether as weapon, decoration (notably the Doof-mobile) or the outcome of some spectacular crash. If you watch the extras on the Fury Road Blu-ray, it's obvious that the film's flame effects are a combination of practical and CG, but on the UHD almost every flame looks like a painted cartoon. Just as the enhanced depth and detail are pulling you into the film's ravaged wasteland, the artificiality of these effects pushes you back out. The same is true for the fierce dust storm in which Furiosa first loses her pursuers; in its theatrical and Blu-ray presentation, the storm was convincing and credible, but on UHD one is struck by the obviousness of the computer imagery.

It will obviously get better as cameras, cgi artists and editors get better at handling 4K HDR footage. Yet blu-ray had immediate very visible benefits accross the board, even with the single layer gimped mpeg-2 versions of movies. Doesn't seem to be the case with these early upscaled 4K movies with added HDR effects.

The thing is, most movies are still filmed below 4K, processed in 2K and old movies on 35mm don't benefit much from a 4K release and don't have any HDR capabilities unless added in post processing. Which movie purists usually loath, the slight digital color grading (green tint) of Lotr EE on blu-ray got a lot of hate.

I had hoped the 4K disc format would be more future proof. Actual rec.2020 12 bit 4:4:4 Dolby vision, instead it's DCI P3 10 bit 4:2:0 HDR 10. It's better than blu-ray for sure, yet it also already feels outdated from the start. I blame the failure of HVD. 4K UHD is limited by it's max 100GB discs, that's only double a blu-ray disc, while blu-ray is over 5 times the size of a DVD.

For now there are indeed slight benefits. But sure, if you're going to pay a couple grand for a 4K HDR tv, I would want to see some 4K UHD discs on it too. I bet upscaled blu-ray will look pretty good on those new tvs as well. I'll wait for the HDR dust to settle first.

Like what you said, the technology is still new. In fact, it was just released 2nd quarter this year. And please please do a research on what 4k do to your tv. More resolution just adds more sharpness. 4k doesnt affect the color tint, color grading, black level or whatsoever. If there's a difference between the bluray and UHD bluray version, it's caused by the color correction that the movie producer apply to the disc (the same thing that they've done to any remaster version).

Resolution also depends on its viewing distance. Watch them at their optimal distance, and i bet no one will say that the difference between 4k and 1080p is not substantial.

 

The same thing can be said abt HDR. It's a really new technology. Yes, there are still a lot of problems with current HDR. but luckily, those problems can be resolved with firmware update.

 

If there's one direction video industry is going, it's 4k video. I'm not saying ppl need it for video games, but it's such a missed opportunity for Sony. Especially since the market is still barely touched.



Around the Network
m_csquare said:

Like what you said, the technology is still new. In fact, it was just released 2nd quarter this year. And please please do a research on what 4k do to your tv. More resolution just adds more sharpness. 4k doesnt affect the color tint, color grading, black level or whatsoever. If there's a difference between the bluray and UHD bluray version, it's caused by the color correction that the movie producer apply to the disc (the same thing that they've done to any remaster version).

Yes I realize that, which is why it makes me wonder what the originally intended version was? Is it the color corrected UHD version, or is the blu-ray version a better representation of the theatrical version? That's why I mentioned the green tint debacle with the lotr extended blu-ray edition. Same with adding HDR effects that so far no digital cinema could reproduce.

Resolution also depends on its viewing distance. Watch them at their optimal distance, and i bet no one will say that the difference between 4k and 1080p is not substantial.

Indeed, which is why I'm waiting for true 4K projectors to become affordable as at 12ft from my living room tv, upgrading that to a 60" 4K TV probably still won't do it justice. 4K is great for PC monitors and projectors, don't see the value in a TV. (Except for HDR)

The same thing can be said abt HDR. It's a really new technology. Yes, there are still a lot of problems with current HDR. but luckily, those problems can be resolved with firmware update.

Hopefully firmware updates can do that. As for projectors, they're far behind when it comes to reproducing HDR

If there's one direction video industry is going, it's 4k video. I'm not saying ppl need it for video games, but it's such a missed opportunity for Sony. Especially since the market is still barely touched.

The tech is still new and unfortunately not backwards compatible. Needing a new amp for the same sound is a big hindrance, plus with hd-dvd / blu-ray you already had amazing results compared to dvd on a HD ready 600 line CRT tv.

It's different this time. Before I bought the player first, upgraded tv and sound later and actually build a home theater for it in 2007. Now there is no incremental upgrade path.



BuckStud said:
pbroy said:

It's not important for PS4 Pro. What is importent though and with PS4 even, is external HDD support.

Nope, not important at all as anyone who only has a PS4 will be more than happy to go out and buy a $400 Sony stand alone UHD Bluray player.  What happened to "It Only Does Everything"?  Now it's "It only Does Somethings".

That was a PS3 era slogan. And we all know how the "It Only Does Everything" thing turned out for Sony. Don't we?

Btw. they don't use PS1/PS2 slogans anymore either. 

 

Pavolink said:
Are options bad now?

Logical reasoning is. That's for sure.

 

In times when physical media is strongly on the decline - games, music and movies wise - to expect the market will embrace a new physical media format in the way it was the case with DVD and BluRay is just plain... irrational.

What to expect, is a long tedious seep in, nowhere close to the transitions of the past.



Hunting Season is done...

I would have very much liked for it to play UHD BR. They already have all the necessary decoding hard/software in it, HDMI2.0a with HDCP2.2 support. All that's missing was the proper drive.
I am not buying a huge number of BR disks, but there are a couple of movies I might have bought. After all they are currently the only format to properly use UHD TVs (that is if you have one with 10bit panel, HDR and DCI-P3 coverage).

Not buying a standalone player just now for the price of a PS4.

But I can understand why they did it. Most likely taking already a loss on the console: adding the proper drive would eat too much into the bottom line or increase the sales price to a point where people wouldn't buy the console. Most likely also the reason why there are no game bundles.

Plus, it's not like they need to convince people to support their format over a competitor's this time around.

Now, I didn't own a PS4 up until now. If I did, the inclusion of an UHD BR might have gotten me to switch. But since there's no money to be made from people who already bought a console subsidised by Sony that can play all the games they recover that subsidy... no point in subsidising a second one.



i heard that ps4pro wont have games in native 4k and playing games in HD wonthave any benefits. Like higher fps or smoother graphics, nothing. Even the loadings are same long.