Forgive me for not empathising with the kind of scum who drags unconscious women behind dumpsters and rapes them.

I was speaking in general and referring mostly about the father's comment (since that's what the topic is really about), but thanks for proving my point of people worried about virtue signaling not considering context.

That dude who raped thar girl is not just a rapist, he's a son, he's someone's little boy in his father's memory, he's loved by his father (all presumably) and has someone that is worried about his future. God forbit his father takes his son's side. No, the son is just a rapist, that's all he ever was and all he will ever be. Throw him outer space, pls. Now give me a pat in the back for how righteous I am, pls.

That's a terrible idea, and here's why. False allegations (and convictions) happen. Imprisoning someone for something they didn't do is one thing, but the potential of imprisoning someone and then castrating them is absurd.

With this logic, bin Laden was much more than a terrorist. He was a great son and leader for many men.

Gee, my mistake, I forgot that raping unconscious women is just fine. It's how you get them to the location that matters.

I have to agree with this sentiment, I doubt his dad would brush it off as only "20 minutes" if it was his daughter, wife or sister as the victim, the shit people say will never cease to amaze me.

Unfortunately the past doesn't matter. Whether if he's a drug dealer or the president of the United States, this was a horrible case that should give him a long prison sentence.

With this logic, bin Laden was much more than a terrorist. He was a great son and leader for many men.

While he gets 6 months, someone I know is getting 5 years just for owning marijuana.

Smh.