| kyprime said: kinda funny what? gamecast? colin & greg live? |
Pretty sure it was C&G Live... was just today on twitch.
I gave it a 91 / 100. Really enjoyed it and it's a great finale to the series.
https://mobile.twitter.com/i/status/731498514899972096/photo/1
welp, the game got another 80, all we need is another below 60 or something like that and we have the 92 meta
| kyprime said: welp, the game got another 80, all we need is another below 60 or something like that and we have the 92 meta |
Why we should have another Troll Review ? One is not enough ? Just think positive, and if The Troll Review gets removed, we go back to 94.
”Every great dream begins with a dreamer. Always remember, you have within you the strength, the patience, and the passion to reach for the stars to change the world.”
Harriet Tubman.
Nate4Drake said:
Why we should have another Troll Review ? One is not enough ? Just think positive, and if The Troll Review gets removed, we go back to 94. |
i've emailed them and they said that the review is 100% legit and they won't remove it
There are other 100% legit reviews with scores like 10/10 on their list of reviewers, and metacritic choose not to post it.
We will see with the Petition : The Review is a Joke, like written by a 5 years old kid, and they have to clarify on that.
Otherwise we all might think Metacritic is a complete joke and we can't take it seriously, more than ever.
”Every great dream begins with a dreamer. Always remember, you have within you the strength, the patience, and the passion to reach for the stars to change the world.”
Harriet Tubman.
they know about the petition and the criticism of the review, that's their response
"I understand your disappointment with the opinions expressed in Michael’s review and I am aware of the petition. His opinion and those of all of our critics are their own and we give our critics a wide lane to express their opinions.
We post approximately one video game review each week, the bulk of them are written by Christopher Byrd, but Michael is a frequent contributor. Soon after we started posting reviews, about 1.5 years ago, Chris approached Metacritic to see if they would be interested in blurbing and linking to our content. They were, but required a rating in order to do so. Chris and I did not want to include ratings on washingtonpost.com for a variety of reasons, so we came up with a process whereby the critic writes the review and then, based on what they have written, we assess what rating the review implies. We discuss it a bit, and then provide that rating to Metacritic with the link and the blurb. Michael and I agreed that, in this case, the 4 rating fit his opinions of the game, which are expressed in the review."
it seems that the review is going nowhere, metacritic has no say in this, it's not their mistake or anything like that, it all comes from washingtonpost
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
