By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Does Square Enix alone have better games in the pipeline then nintendo?

 

Which Publisher has the better lineup?

Square Enix 129 61.43%
 
Nintendo 81 38.57%
 
Total:210

Depends on how you want to look at it. For any single person his own opinion is more important than any "objective" comparison.

For example, I'd rather only have Zelda U than all those SE games combined. Like; say if there were two boxes in front of me and I can take only one; one with only Zelda U in it, one stuffed with all of SE's games. I'd take the box with just Zelda in it without hesitation. Therefore to me, no, SE doesn't have a better line-up than Nintendo in the foreseeable future.



Around the Network

even if we say both companies would have equal games quality whise, dont forget SE is just ONE third party publisher for systems like the ps4.
You will also have bethesda games, rockstars (gta), witcher, ubisoft, ea, konami (metal gear), Activision + sony/microsofts own exclusives lineup.

Also considering ps4/xbox one are almost same price as wii u AND are technically WAY advanced in terms of performance, thats really ridiclous right?

PS: i own a wii u, love it. But thinking about this feels .. uhm..



Viktor said:
Really stupid comparison for several reasons for one you list games that were announced almost up to 10 years ago on last gen hardware like FF15(priviously known as FF13Verus). Then port collections like Kingdom Hearts 2.8 and KH3, the latter has also been announced almost 3 years ago and isanother game that we won´t see at retail for years. Games that have been used to bolster retarded list wars by fanboys for years.

KH3 is not a port.

 

I listed ports for both sides (kh 2.8; Twilight princess HD)



Viktor said:
At the very least we can agree that both SQEX and Nintendo obliterate Sonys pathetic games lineup.


Maybe you can agree with yourself if that makes you feel any better. Don't expect others to agree.



Roronaa_chan said:
Viktor said:
At the very least we can agree that both SQEX and Nintendo obliterate Sonys pathetic games lineup.


Maybe you can agree with yourself if that makes you feel any better. Don't expect others to agree.


More than happy to disagree with a Gust fan. Doesn´t change the pathetic Sony lineup and how they must be laughing at loyal PSV fans, that expected actual effort by Sony going in.

 

@JNK

Obviously referred to KH2.8. KH3 was just another example of a game that has been used in retarded list-wars to bolster a current years lineup despite beeing a game that won´t be available for years, and therefore will be used in yearly list-wars again and again. The prime example for this silliness is FF15/FF13Versus that has been in these fanboys list every year the whole 7th gen and ended up on next gen systems.



Around the Network
Viktor said:
Roronaa_chan said:


Maybe you can agree with yourself if that makes you feel any better. Don't expect others to agree.


More than happy to disagree with a Gust fan. Doesn´t change the pathetic Sony lineup and how they must be laughing at loyal PSV fans, that expected actual effort by Sony going in.

 




Viktor said:
At the very least we can agree that both SQEX and Nintendo obliterate Sonys pathetic games lineup. It´s really a great thing that they show their true colours when it comes to leeching money from their userbase in regards to "supposed" backwardscompatibility and their handheld business by basically treating the userbase as fools who were ignorant enough to buy a PSV expecting actual Sony support.

A thread about Square Enix and Nintendo, let's bring sony into this and start another flame war yippie let's bring microsoft into this and how there line-up (greatest of all time) is still weaker then sonys weak line-up this year, but that's just my opinion^^

 



We know exactly what the intention of this thread is and from what mentality something like this comes from, otherwise it wouldn´t have been described as "SQEX lineup alone". Also it´s never a bad thing to put some perspective into any topic.



Viktor said:
We know exactly what the intention of this thread is and from what mentality something like this comes from, otherwise it wouldn´t have been described as "SQEX lineup alone". Also it´s never a bad thing to put some perspective into any topic.


i doubt you understood the intention.



I don't think so, but this is completely subjective. Also, you really should have included the SMT x FE game and Pokken Tournament as big games for Wii U (I take it we're not talking about 3DS?).

It's difficult to say what Nintendo is exactly working on right now because I think they've changed to a model in which they don't announce games too early (like they did with Xenoblade). They might have another big Wii U game up their sleeve (and some supporting games) but I expect them to have also started development on NX games (regardless of whether it comes 2016 or 2017) which may or may not be a home console. But of course they won't reveal these games just yet but they are definitely in the pipeline.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that such a list with 'expected games' doesn't say a whole lot about total software output and quality and are largely dependent on timing. What games have already been released, which are unannounced, how good will they turn out be, when will they actually release (FF7 remake might for example not come until 2017) etc are all things to consider



Spending warm summer days indoors   

Writing frightening verse

To a buck-toothed girl in Luxembourg

NES, SNES, N64, GC, Wii, WiiU, GB, GBC, GBA, DS, 3DS, Mega Drive, Game Gear, PS1, PS2, PSP, XBOX 360, Atari Lynx