I'm confused by your first paragraph. Why does the time you realize your HD is full mean that it's close to nothing? most people it would take them years to fill that all. That hardly makes it quilify as nothing. Otherwise. 1 TB is only twice nonthing. 2TB 4 times nothing. Is it a little small? Yeah, but once again most people won't need bigger for years. You can easily replace it with a larger one deleting and installing games on the system is really fast.

There was also an 8 GB wii u. That added quite a bit to the reasons the wii u is thought of to have low space especially since that has only 3 GB of useable space. The next even with 32 GB in the system name you only have about 25GB that you can use. That would be all the save data for all the players and and DLC games or any digital games. It really is a small amount. Many people could be fine with this depending on gaming habbits but I imagine many more will be using external storage. While you can you use thumbdrives. Nintendo themselvse don't recomend this. They recomend ones with extrenal power supplies. They also don't recomend solid state drives. http://en-americas-support.nintendo.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/1474/~/wii-u-internal-storage-space-information.

There are many games on this list that would take up over half of your default hard disk space (as long as you bough the 32, the 8 has a ton of games that would require an external hard drive.It's from April so I"m sure there are more big ones since.

On this even older ps4 list. There is room for every single game and ap listed with 12 gigs to spare.  http://www.ign.com/wikis/playstation-4/PlayStation_4_Actual_Hard_Drive_Space I doubt anyone would want all those games and unless someone was trying to get all the biggest games with all the DLC most people could easily fit over 20 games. No console has ever had a tie ratio even near that, so the console is fine for the masses as is without any more space, while the Wii U could very easily run out of default storage well before then.

I love how people just read the OP, ignore the rest of the thread and trIes to argue things that have already been discussed. I'm done with this thread loooong ago xD

I hadn't seen several of those points made answered by you, I also had some point that werern't made in the 100 plus posts of the thread. It's good to know you won't be replying though, I recomend you ask  a mod to lock the thread then.

The fact that I'm not replaying doesn't mean that other people can't discuss about this thread.

Also yes, every one of your points have been, if not answered completley, discussed. By me or by other people. Anyway, most of your arguing is about "you can't have that many games" or "you can replace the hard drive or delete games". The second point has been discussed a lot. My thing with that is... I don't want to delete any of my games. In fact, I shouldn't have the need of installing them in ther first place: there is a reason why they are physical copies.  The replacing the disk thing... that only reinforces my point of view: sooner or later, if you don't delete your PHYSICAL GAMES, you'll need to replace your hard drive. To have more PHYSICAL GAMES. Can't see that that's just bullshit? And about the second point you make... Well, I can play that many games. Maybe you don't have the money, nor the time to play them. I have ended my working season (we tourism workers at Mallorca work almost exclusivley on summer), I have earned my money and I have plenty of free time. And even if we consider my situation as an abnormaly, in the same way you say that you can have 20+ games on the disk, I can say that with 9 I filled it completley. So, there you have it.

Bye.