Lucasarts adventure games says hi.
| foodfather said: Quit bitching like a little girl. WB have had a fantastic couple of years. Microtransactions didn't hinder my experience one bit with Shadow of Modor, Mad Max or Dying Light. Fantastic sleeper hits. |
Don't tell me not to bitch like a little girl. I know how a little girl bitches, and I'm not bitching like a little girl.
Microtransactions might not hinder your experiences, but other people hate the fact that 60$ games actually have them. I mean if this was EA, people would be telling them their games sucked, even if the game was good.. But nope, people are defending the rights of 60$ games having microtransactions...


Bet with Xander XT:
I can beat more games on his 3DS than he can on my PSVita in a month. Loser has to buy the winner a game on his/her handheld Guess who won? http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=193531
Me!
| Nogamez said: Lucasarts adventure games says hi. |
That was before, way back during the 90s. They kinda sucked during their last years.


Bet with Xander XT:
I can beat more games on his 3DS than he can on my PSVita in a month. Loser has to buy the winner a game on his/her handheld Guess who won? http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=193531
Me!
| sethnintendo said: Welcome to the age of DLC. |
Not all companies are like this.


Bet with Xander XT:
I can beat more games on his 3DS than he can on my PSVita in a month. Loser has to buy the winner a game on his/her handheld Guess who won? http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=193531
Me!
The_Sony_Girl1 said:
Really? You must be patient to not have any good marvel games in 4 years. |
It takes about 3 years minimum to make a new AAA game from scratch. If Disney doesn't have any new Marvel games announced within the next two years, then you might have a point. But until then I'm fine with waiting since understand this shit takes time. It took time for us to get a great Batman game, but once we got one more games quickly followed.
The_Sony_Girl1 said:
They make a terrible game company. Not games. |
Then that makes alot of game companies terrible game companies.
Bet with gooch_destroyer, he wins if FFX and FFX-2 will be at $40 each for the vita. I win if it dont
Sign up if you want to see God Eater 2 get localized!! https://www.change.org/petitions/shift-inc-bring-god-eater-2-to-north-america-2#share
If you were talking about movies tie-in games I would agree with you... But Disney and WB have put very good games along the time.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
| Teeqoz said: Sony is a film company. ![]() |
That explains why PlayStation is such a terrible console on all the 4 interactions =p

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
Sony is a film company.
Sony and Warner Bros make great games. As for DLC's and microtransactions, you can ignore them in most games. They are just there for additional money for developers, which is fine by me if that's what they require to continue to make AAA games.