| Dgc1808 said: I prefer this, but it's possible they don't have much of a choice, lol. I wouldn't be surprised if a big part of this decision was just for the sake of disc space. |
Nah. With game installs, that's not a problem.
| Dgc1808 said: I prefer this, but it's possible they don't have much of a choice, lol. I wouldn't be surprised if a big part of this decision was just for the sake of disc space. |
Nah. With game installs, that's not a problem.
starcraft said:
Close enough, but the PS3 is substantially less powerful than the PS4 I think about what would have been possible for Naughty Dog now though. Look at this CGI Blizzard came up with for WC3 - nearly a decade ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCkubpGP98g The PS4 is reasonably powerful, ND's in-engine scenes will look great. And I do accept the argument that from some that jumping to something that looks markedly better than in-game can be distracting. But I still like to watch those awesome CGI scenes |
Hum... Naughty Dog chose in-engine cut-scenes since Uncharted 1 instead of the S-E/Blizzard CGI approach.
Now, they will still be in-engine, but instead of being pre-rendered, they'll be rendered in real-time. There's not that much of a change in the way they do them.
Sooo exciteddd
REQUIESCAT IN PACE
I Hate REMASTERS
I Hate PLAYSTATION PLUS
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
