Nintendo becoming a 3rd party dev would be great, as long as they don't end up like Sega.
Would things have been better for the "gamer" as a whole? | |||
| yes! Nintendo for everyone! less Big N hate. | 14 | 13.59% | |
| No, Nintendo as a company... | 28 | 27.18% | |
| No | 43 | 41.75% | |
| yes | 4 | 3.88% | |
| other post below | 1 | 0.97% | |
| see results | 13 | 12.62% | |
| Total: | 103 | ||
Nintendo becoming a 3rd party dev would be great, as long as they don't end up like Sega.
| Captain_Yuri said: No thanks... I dont want mario kart to be locked behind a paywall |
If it means less comunication errors and lag, then I wouldn't mind paying for online multiplayer.
BasilZero said:
Soon we'll have a paywall for single player games like they have on iOS/mobile. "Insert more funds to play for longer" or "Wait X amount of minutes to regain (Stamina)". |
I understand why people don't like paying for online but there are some other benefits like free games and better discounts as well as dedicated servers. And I usually only pay $40 a year for Gold so it's not that much to pay.
Nintendo games would feel pretty darn alien on another console... In my ideal world both would be going strong.
I just dug out my old Dreamcast a few days ago while I was down in my childhood home, actually, and as soon as I find a second VMU so that the dang controller will work my buddy and I are seriously looking forward to House of the Dead II lol... I still have three guns and they all work wonderfully.
MoHasanie said:
I understand why people don't like paying for online but there are some other benefits like free games and better discounts as well as dedicated servers. And I usually only pay $40 a year for Gold so it's not that much to pay. |
People who want such benefits could pay, but charging for the basic right of playing online is absurd.