Your RE5 shot is the PC version running on what seems to be less than optimum settings.

I cannot imaging what sort of comparison you are trying to make.

He's talking about in-game graphics cutscene vs in-engine graphics cutscene. I believe what this means is in in-game cutscenes the models
 used are the same as during gameplay and in in-engine cutscenes different, more detailed models are used but those aren't the ones you play with. If that is the case (and I think this was already proved to be right but dunno for sure) what his saying is that XCX cutscenes are representative of the gameplay graphics whilst the others are not. So in order to compare graphics you can't use XCX cutscene Vs Others cutscene, but instead XCX cutscene/gameplay shot Vs Otehrs gameplay shot.

Every single Xenoblade X image linked is from a cutscene. Literally every single one.

He's talking about in-game graphics cutscene vs in-engine graphics cutscene. I believe what this means is in in-game cutscenes the models used are the same as during gameplay and in in-engine cutscenes different, more detailed models are used but those aren't the ones you play with. If that is the case (and I think this was already proved to be right but dunno for sure) what his saying is that XCX cutscenes are representative of the gameplay graphics whilst the others are not. So in order to compare graphics you can't use XCX cutscene Vs Others cutscene, but instead XCX cutscene/gameplay shot Vs Otehrs gameplay shot.

Yeah, but their cutscenes use in game character models while FF XII does not.

You're wrong. FF XII does the exact same.

Unless you mean the CGI cut-scenes, in which case there are barely any in FF XII.

You picked THE WORST  possible screenshots and they still in those look better than the characters in Xenoblade ...

And some of the shots we cant even see the faces like the ff 13 one and the last of us one.

But nice try.

Hold on a second... There's a B2S screen in there. Is he really implying that this:



Is more technically impressive than this:

B2S has 30k models (with effort put into efficiency), realistic light surface scattering (yay for skin pores), and motion captured facial and body animations, aided by hundreds of model "bones". Not to mention a properly defined hair mesh.

Sitting next to XCX's plastic lighting and what appears to be hand animated models, you'd think B2S was the 8th gen game, not XCX (based purely on the models). That shouldn't be at all surprising either. B2S has a much much stronger focus on models than most games. It puts those in many PS4/X1 titles to shame, let alone those in an open world WiiU title. I think i'm a pretty objective person; i do my best to respect and see the merit in other people's opinions, but i honestly can't understand this one.