ryuzaki57 said: mature games can't sell on WiiU unless they're exclusives, meta 90+ and pushed by the publisher, the press and the fans... |
And even with all that it may struggle.
ryuzaki57 said: mature games can't sell on WiiU unless they're exclusives, meta 90+ and pushed by the publisher, the press and the fans... |
And even with all that it may struggle.
torok said: Expected. And after Bayo 2 fiasco we should only wait for Devil's Third to really conclude that there isn't a market for mature games on Nintendo consoles. |
Bayonetta 2 fiasco? it's doing better than the first game.
KylieDog said:
|
No, it would have sold pretty well if it released on time, 500k+ ltd. after all the BS, it'll struggle to reach 200k.
I'm more surprised this game was released.
Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever
Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe
Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor
Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile
DevilRising said: A significant amount of peeps (enough at least to make a decent community on Miiverse) seem to have downloaded it, buying it digitally, not physically. But yes, it was never going to do well, the way Ubisoft handled it. Sad, really. It could have done better. If they had released it on time, or better yet, worked on it some more with all that extra time, given it some REAL exclusive content to care about, and released it for at least $10 cheaper than full price, and it might have done better. And not releasing it right before Smash, yeah, bad move. They really did set it up to fail. First screwing Wii U out of Rayman exclusivity (which all those other ports didn't even wind up netting them much in sales), and then this. *shrugs* Oh well. There are a lot of great looking eShop games in the pipeline. I think I'm good. |
it didn't have extra time. ubisoft pathetically moved the developers of the wii u version to the other versions.
daredevil.shark said:
|
one whole example? and AC liberation was exclusive. how about talking about rayman legends?
oniyide said:
2. it doesnt matter cause taht game didnt do well anyway/ |
with the difference in installed bases, it sold far better on wii u.
Metallox said:
Maybe people forgot that Nintendo exists, and I'm being serious. There are also many prejudices against Nintendo, like they only make Zelda, Mario and Pokémon games, but actually they have a good bunch of IPs but they pass unnoticed because they don't catch too much attention. And we still don't have confirmed numbers for Bayonetta 2 in the United States. Even if it has already vanished from British and Japanese charts, I hold my breath |
That's on Nintendo to be honest. There is VERY little advertising coming out of Nintendo in the UK and North America. Unless it's one of their big names, they don't commercialize it on TV, billboards. I don't even see anything in Gamestop. You walk into Gamestop and even C-list Xbox One/PS4 games are being advertised around the store, especially during the summer when bigger titles are scarce, yet there is hardly anything about games like Wonderful 101, Professor Layton and so on. Not every single gamer spends time on message boards where they can be exposed to these types of games, I know I wouldn't have known about Wonderful 101 had it not been for VGC.
Materia-Blade said: Bayonetta 2 fiasco? it's doing better than the first game. |
According to VGChartz, but there is a rumor that NPD for October (aka Bayo 2 first week) has it only at 70k... here is the link for the rumor:
http://www.gonintendo.com/?mode=viewstory&id=242355