radishhead said:
Stefl1504 said:
So, how fishy are those two on a scale form 0-10, 10 being a rotting fish-mafiosi, 0 being a good townie-lamb
|
Padib: 5/10 - The points that I made earlier, despite being primarily as a device to create more discussion, were based in truth. I do think that I stumbled across something just because of the way that he reacted to my statements. If it does turn out he's mafia, then I already have a good idea of a couple of his mafia friends. I am actually probably looking for a Padib lynch today because I believe that if a Day 1 lynch has to happen, it has to be able to provide INFORMATION. I will get good information on the motives of other players upon seeing Padib's true alignment.
White: 6/10 - There is no denying that other players have made good points about some strange methods of play that White has been using so far this game: the whole issue surrounding the "doctor", and the comment about Kirby being a watcher and so on. If he's not a mafia, then he may well be a role that revolves around other people's roles in some way? Maybe a transporter? However, despite considering White to be more likely to be a mafia member than Padib at the moment, I don't feel that I could get as much information from a White lynch at the moment, and therefore it isn't worth the risk.
|
What information do you think we would get from a padib flip? The way I see it, if he flips town, you, khan and white all look like scum, if he flips scum then ... what? I don't see how that flip gives us any more information, in fact, seems to me we would get exactly the same information from flipping Khan or white, with the added benefit that they have generated much more discussion. And they both have semi reasonable cases against them, unless someone has dug up something I have missed then the case against padib is not very substantial and basically is built around your chainsaw defense of White.
I agree that we don't have any solid cases at all, but at least the case against White makes sense. I still don't think he is the best lynch, but that is not because of his defense against the case against him which is pretty much non-exsistant. And then we have Khan who seems the scummiest of all. Yet you would prefer to lynch the third most suspicious option. I really don't get it. Feel free to fill me in on what I am missing here.