By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Starcraft Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

Wait Why are you even asking who people think the nuke is?



Around the Network

Im only bringing it up to point out how hypocritical padib is being.
thats not scumhunting. Thats talking nonsense.
he intentionally lied about his role and its abilities last game.
this game I only lied about the name because I wanted to curtail any sti paid arguments.
I never intentionally covered up or lied about my role.



How were you able to cast your ability last night when you said the emp is a roleblocking effect?



So, we've established that there are rules to formal logic, and eliminated 6 people as nuker if all claims are to be believed. Might have found a zergling too, I guess the day could have gone worse.

So, I don't really know who the nuke is. its clear to everyone why wright is so nuke crazy, but who bit? I don't know, can't wait for the big reveal from padib, my guess is he'll say the nuke is prof so that the ongoing squabble can be settled. I am disappointed that the day started with consensus to find the nuke but ended up being about infighting instead. Towns been doing a great job so far on the previous Days, I'll leave it to everyone to decide what has changed since then.

Anyway, I wonder what character Cone is, maybe he'll tell us tomorrow?



I just reread somethung. How is it possible for a blocker to not block you?
You said someone tried to block you, and it failed.
literally how is that possible?
You said night one you used your sense ability which told you that the two kills were protoss.
this ability also has a passive that makes you a self watcher. Yet you didnt know wright had targeted you.
you claim to have used your own psionic whatever last night and someone who tried to block you failed, because you were invulnerable. By invulnerable only means you cant be killed, not you cant be blocked..
are you passively invulnerable? Because between psionic and sense you couldn't have used an invulnerable ability unless you can use two skills at once.
so you're invulnerable u nblockable self watcher kill diviner psionic shield breaking nuke surviving third party with another unknown ability. Call me crazy but you sound impossible.



Around the Network

in some cases it might seem a stupid town on town argument. Last game, this game seems scum on scum.

Padib, I don't have a set person I think the nuke is, I gave my list with my impressions of everyone before. Part of why the hunt is so strong for the nuker today is so there are two days to lynch as well as in theory two nights. With one of those nights being the potential for more scans or even a scum on scum kill before our second chance to lynch.

I'm really annoyed by your claim and then saying your going off. you might think of it as a chance to get reads while you are gone, but you could have done that without claiming and increased chances of meaningful discussion. Now it's going to come down to many people just wanting to wait it out.



Imp
what do you think has changed?



theprof00 said:
I just reread somethung. How is it possible for a blocker to not block you?
You said someone tried to block you, and it failed.
literally how is that possible?
You said night one you used your sense ability which told you that the two kills were protoss.
this ability also has a passive that makes you a self watcher. Yet you didnt know wright had targeted you.
you claim to have used your own psionic whatever last night and someone who tried to block you failed, because you were invulnerable. By invulnerable only means you cant be killed, not you cant be blocked..
are you passively invulnerable? Because between psionic and sense you couldn't have used an invulnerable ability unless you can use two skills at once.
so you're invulnerable u nblockable self watcher kill diviner psionic shield breaking nuke surviving third party with another unknown ability. Call me crazy but you sound impossible.


who also was saying at one point we have to wait until day 5 that we might not get



theprof00 said:
Imp
what do you think has changed?

I'm not imp but I can tell you.

Both you and padib are now more active, neither of you are ones to ever just let it go and always seems to need the last word.



What's important that I find from imp is whether he thinks the arguments against me make sense or whether mine do.

What do you think work?