No I'm not being selective. I'm looking at actual facts, the real provable facts. You on the otherhand are focusing on the imagined ramblings of people in other forums and using that as evidence, even tho there is absolutly no proof any of it happened. Most of it has been taken down because again it was all slanderous BS. The one person in the industry she did have a relationship never made any reviews or did any stories about her game. Which disproves your theory. 

The fact that you guys continue to harp on about this, believing the lies of other people, ignoring facts, all so you can continue to bash her says a lot about you. I don't have any double standards, so far the only one with double standards is you. If a guy does this sort of thing you don't bat an eye but a woman does it you go on a crusade and ignore facts even after it's been disproven. I didn't label anyone without facts. I used their words and behavior towards the woman in question as evidence. If you come here and bash her and treat her like a monster and like some enemy that needs to be attacked instead of a human being, if you give the men invovled a free pass and even treat them like they were victems that were manipulated by her, and if you use the postings and words of others from MRA threads on reddit then guess what it's fair to say that person is a MRA and its not a double standard.

So you guys can either accept the facts as they have been proven or you can continue on this now even more baseless crusade to attack someone that frankly doesn't deserve it. It just makes you look bad.

 I didn't label anyone without facts. I used their words and behavior towards the woman in question as evidence.

No I'm not being selective. I'm looking at actual facts, the real provable facts. You on the otherhand are focusing on the imagined ramblings of people in other forums and using that as evidence, even tho there is absolutly no proof any of it happened. Most of it has been taken down because again it was all slanderous BS. The one person in the industry she did have a relationship never made any reviews or did any stories about her game. Which disproves your theory. 

The fact that you guys continue to harp on about this, believing the lies of other people, ignoring facts, all so you can continue to bash her says a lot about you. I don't have any double standards, so far the only one with double standards is you. If a guy does this sort of thing you don't bat an eye but a woman does it you go on a crusade and ignore facts even after it's been disproven. I didn't label anyone without facts. I used their words and behavior towards the woman in question as evidence. If you come here and bash her and treat her like a monster and like some enemy that needs to be attacked instead of a human being, if you give the men invovled a free pass and even treat them like they were victems that were manipulated by her, and if you use the postings and words of others from MRA threads on reddit then guess what it's fair to say that person is a MRA and its not a double standard.

So you guys can either accept the facts as they have been proven or you can continue on this now even more baseless crusade to attack someone that frankly doesn't deserve it. It just makes you look bad.

No there really isn't. There are forums posts from people that dreamed up nonsense. The only provable facts are that she had a relationship with someone at kotaku and the person at kotaku never reviewed her game or wrote a story aobut her game. That means it's been disproven. There is no real evidence that says otherwise. Just BS .

And who are you, exactly, just as distanced from the events as everyone else, to decide what is fact, and what is 'basely rumor and slander'?
You are simply pushing your opinions on others because the opinions they hold don't set well with you.

Also, where exactly does he "continue to bash her" in his post?

Guess what most of the posters in this thread are using to label Zoe Quinn, could it possibly be her words, both in private to her then-boyfriend, and in the aftermath across the internet?

Lookie lookie who's the one who's making baseless claims now? How do you know how he'd react if this was a guy instead.

 I don't have any double standards, so far the only one with double standards is you. If a guy does this sort of thing you don't bat an eye but a woman does it you go on a crusade and ignore facts even after it's been disproven.

A lot of things can't be definitively proven, but that doesn't mean we should just pretend that there is no controversy going on. There are plenty of valid talking points here, from journalistic integrity to equality in the games industry and the fact that you (Nickle) just keep trying to silence everyone, isn't helping anyone. 

As for the specific case, the exact details have not been worked out. We do not have all of the facts, but there is a good amount of evidence leading to the belief that professionally unethical behavior has taken place. For example, the Kotaku guy did publish a story, briefly highlighting Depression Quest as one of the most notable games hitting Steam Greenlight (out of a batch of 50) on Rock Paper Shotgun and there are the two other industry figures who still have open allegations...

There is no need for you to silence this thread. It is not sexist, it is not by misogynists, and in reality, you are probably creating more attention for the issue by sparking these debates. 

When a male games developer is accused of cheating on his girlfriend with a female member of the press and several other industry folk, you'll find out.

Though I suspect if that were to actually happen, the "facts" for you would shift towards the posted chatlogs of the cheated-on girlfriend.

Ultimately there is a guy in all this, who would, initially at least, seem to have a high tollerance for abuse, who has been both emotionally and mentally abused, just like any case of private relationship abuse we cannot, and will not know the whole story and get the entire picture, but I am perfectly willing to give him the benefit of doubt for his claims of such abuse, as I would be anyone else, his gender should not and does not detract or invalidate his claims - if he says he has been emotionally and mentally abused, then we *have* to take it seriously and give him the benefit of doubt, just as we would if anyone else were to make the claim, regardless of gender -

Because that is the true meaning of equality.

Most of the posters aren't using her words they are using the words and posts in other forums and on reddit or the words of her jealous and angry ex-boyfriend, None of which qualifies as fact. Do you really not understand the difference between fact and rumor? If so that explains so much. The things you use as "evidence" aka the postings of 3rd party people who were never there that have no proof to back up their claims and are just saying it to hurt her, that is Baseless slander. Then we have provable fact which is that the man she had a relationship with at kotaku never wrote a story about her game or reviewed it since their relationship. So again your hypothesis has been proven wrong. 

So you can either accept that and move on or you can ignore the facts and continue harping on about it which only proves you are motivated by and innate hatred of the woman

There were apparently 5 guys invovled and so far he's given them a free pass, completely ignoring their part in it. That's not baseless.