I call The Last of Us: Remaster an "evil move" cause its a game where at first glance, you don't really see too much of a noticeable difference in many comparison videos/pictures. You really have to look to see a difference or play the game to feel that 60fps which goes to show just how impressive the game on the ps3 really was but how unimpressive of an improvement it is on the ps4 vs say WW vs WWHD. At first glance, you can already tell which game is on the wiiU and which game is on the GC. Even if you compare it on dolphin emulator, you can tell the difference right away
Now, obviously, the reason behind that is WW is over a decade old and the Last of Us is 1 years old which but that doesn't stop the issue that you can hardly see a difference at first glance. Now, this could have been easily avoided if they did a remake on an older game, any game. We all know Sony has tons of games in their library waiting to be remastered yet they chose to "remaster" that one.
Now, the valid argument is obviously, if you haven't played it, then heres ur chance on the ps4 and no one is arguing with that but, it would have been the same case if they chose any other game that isn't 1 years old and the visuals would have been different enough for the people that already played it, to play it again and none of these arguments and downplaying would have existed to begin with
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KduOELli6bI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4hOVb1GCfg
Oh and WW doesn't cost $60?
http://www.amazon.com/The-Legend-Zelda-nintendo-wii-u/dp/B002I0GF72/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1408041323&sr=8-1&keywords=wind+waker+hd
Oh and dont forget, Nintendo has collections too like the Zelda Collection, Mario Collection, Metroid Collection and etc