By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Should Multiplats At E3 Conferences Be Consider A Good Thing Or Bad Thing?

 

Is Multiplats At First Party Conferences A Good Thing

Yes 62 50.00%
 
No 62 50.00%
 
Total:124
mZuzek said:
Pristine20 said:

Lastly, I know only Mario and Zelda qualify as good games to you but IMO, if those were my only options, I'd have given up gaming after the SNES.


Not the case, not even close. In fact, I was never a big Mario fan, especially more recently.
This is exactly my problem with most sony fans, they just assume stuff like that.
There's a lot of stereotypes in the world of gaming, and from just about any gamer I know, sony fans are by FAR the ones that most follow them. Everyone I know wants to get a PS4 and hates both the Xbox One and Wii U just because.

EDIT: No war intended.

You have some nerve to complain about assumptions after making a comment like this:

"Well, clearly a lot of PS3/360 owners (especially those filthy Sony fans (ironic)) actually want to spend $400 just to play a graphically enhanced version of an average third party game. I still can't seem to understand HOW"

First of all, I'm not a "sony fan". I do most of my gaming on PS consoles because of a strong legacy of 3rd party games that I like. Secondly, you commented that "3rd party games are average" which would imply that you prefer first party games. Now since Link is your avatar and you slammed the PS360 folk, one can only assume that you're a ninty fan who likes Zelda (I like how you didn't deny this part too). What else other game usually  goes with Zelda? What else do you like?  Smash,  Pikimin, Pokemon,   Wii fit or anything published by nintendo? lmao

You on the other hand were spouting complete nonsense and were rightfully called on it.



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

Around the Network

the only times exclusives are important, is when you want to pick one console over another. as a gamer, its never a bad thing seeing more games to play...regardless of who makes them.



Third parties are basically parasites. The platform makers make the industry for them, otherwise they would be confined to PC. That they get so lionized and fought over as if they are some sort of prize is a sign of the problems of the industry, and quite far from a good thing.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Mr Khan said:
Third parties are basically parasites. The platform makers make the industry for them, otherwise they would be confined to PC. That they get so lionized and fought over as if they are some sort of prize is a sign of the problems of the industry, and quite far from a good thing.

Considering you're Nintendo fan, I'm not surprised at all with your view, but in all honesty, 3rd parties are symbiotes - that's why MS and Sony like them so much and they like MS and Sony back.