I did.  I played both side by side to spot differences, too.  WW Remake was one of 2013's best games for me.

Tomb Raider Legend came out for the Xbox 360 soon after it came out for the Xbox and PS2. The only improvement was HD. I bought both versions. This isn't a big deal.

/thread.

*edit* wrong thread

regardless,it was a really good game. play the old tomb raider games,if your that unhappy about it. 

If the "definitive" version had gone to 60fps then I might be getting it again for $60, but at still 30fps, just the other visual upgrades are only worth $30 to me

So that being the case, the infographic leads me down to: Ok, but tell a friend

First of all, when a new generation of consoles comes out, it's not unusual for a game to be released on both the new and old generation of consoles.  If the argument than is that it's a year old game, it's still being released on a new console, and it adds content and features so it's full price is justified.  Wind Waker HD added a few features but it was mostly a graphic upgrade of a ten year old game that was being sold at full retail, so unless he made a video on that than it's pointless to argue.  Games get rereleased and often when they do it's significantly more expensive than just buying the original release, so this argument should be applied to all those games to.  Most of the rereleases don't add anything meaningfull and just have slightly better graphics or better FPS so the guy obviously has a bone to pick with Tomb Raider.  

Hopefully this warrants a sequel. I would definitely buy it.

Nice, I contributed. I bought it in Nov.