Xbox One manufacturer forcing launch day parity

We’ve been holding off writing about Microsoft’s overdue Xbox One indie policies for a few days now, because this is something that really shouldn’t be particularly relevant on a PlayStation-centric site. There’s always wider competitive overlap that we look to explore, of course, but the details of another platform holder’s self-publishing protocol really shouldn’t matter to fans of the PlayStation 4 and Vita. However, it does when some clauses may adversely affect Sony’s systems.

Last week, the Redmond-based manufacturer announced the first set of developers that had signed up to its ID@Xbox program. The terribly titled initiative essentially allows smaller studios – such asGuacamelee developer Drinkbox and Divekick outfit Iron Galaxy – to self-publish their games on the Xbox maker’s machine. It also provides them with access to two development kits and a Unity game engine license for free. Not a bad deal at all, huh?

Judging by developer comments, it’s actually all very reasonable, apart from one clause: the company demands launch day parity with other platforms. That means that a studio can sign up to self-publish their titles on the Xbox One, as long as they don't release on the PS4, Vita, or even Wii U first. There’s good news for teams that have already signed timed exclusive deals with Sony, as the manufacturer is willing to waive the restriction for those games – but moving forwards, it’s day-and-date releases or nothing.

Why is this bad for PlayStation, then? It’s quite simple really: the studios that are going to benefit from the self-publishing program are unlikely to always have the resources to deploy on multiple platforms at once. This clause could strong-arm studios into delaying their wares on PlayStation while they prepare an Xbox One version, or it may force them to focus on Microsoft’s machine first – even if they don’t really want to.

Australian developer Witch Beam – which is working on the upcoming twin-stick shooter Assault Android Cactus – is one such outfit that’s being negatively affected by the policy. “The simple answer is that our plans wouldn't meet the launch day parity requirement of the ID@Xbox program,” co-creator Sanatana Mishra told Eurogamer.net when asked why his studio hadn't signed up to the new initiative. “We started development on our other console versions long before self-publishing was an option for the Xbox One, and the only way we could meet that requirement would be to delay the other versions of [the game].”

Some may argue that this all just smart business on the North American firm’s behalf, but the outcome of this policy seems set to achieve little more than hurting gamers and developers alike.Sony could counteract the clause by forcing launch day parity, too, but that would contrast the positive message that it’s sent out to developers thus far. The only hope, then, is that the online backlash forces Microsoft to reconsider – again.

http://www.pushsquare.com/news/2013/12/how_microsofts_hostile_indie_policies_could_impact_ps4

This was already a thread.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=173689&page=1

This article discusses the possible effects of the policies, not just their existence.

I thought that the effects were clear with the whole "Day one parity" announcement.

I hear you. But if that were to be true, then there'd be no need to discuss or analyse anything if every announcement was ''clear enough''

That's actually a pretty good article, even if it's from a Playstation-centric publication.

This isn't a very good policy. Very few small developers can launch on all systems at once, which means, basically, that Microsoft is trying to force them to pick Xbox first. It's little more than a strong-arm tactic. I hope the backlash forces them to abandon this.

I think the guys running the program for Microsoft are doing a good job but I still get the impression that the people at the top are still out of touch and trying to bully everyone not attached to a big publisher.

Eh, I think when it comes to getting free dev kits, software licensing and patches it comes with some type of compromise.

Or they can just apply after they release the game on the systems they have already coded

80% of all indie games are crap anyhow. Indies are getting far too much air time this generation so far. Last gen when most indies were on X360, PS owners downplayed the role of indies and didn't even consider the games as exclusives even though they were. Now all of a sudden indies are the "in thing" because that pretty much sums up the uniqueness of PS4's launch lineup.

Most indie devts don't have the ability to release a game as large in scope as CoD, BF, Mass Effect, Dragon Age, Final Fantasy, Tom Clancy, Need for Speed, etc.

Indies (for the most part, not always) develop smaller scope games that have some intriguing and unique ideas and become cult classics. They play an important role in bringing innovation to the console industry, but rarely develop anything that catches on to the scale of IPs mentioned above.

i hope they are forced to abandon this too.  the only way i see that happening though is if ps4 outsells xbone by a big enough margin that these smaller developers are better off ignoring xbone altogether then giving it preferential treatment to meet their stupid clause.