ethomaz said:
A simple example... I almost wake up my neighbor laughing with this post.
I know the guy is junior... he is leaning yet... but I'm that jerk guy... I laugh listening the audience's laugh in Friends |
omg, that post. i'm dying over here. im such a fucking nerd.
curl-6 said:
Dat spelling. Did this CBOAT guy suffer brain damage, or is he four years old? |
He does that so his statements can't be searched for or directly attributed to him or somethin to that effect. He claims (think its been verified on NeoGaf) to be an insider so he is trying to relay information anonymously.
Or maybe he does have brain damage... I don't know ;)
ironmanDX said:
It certainly couldn't be hardware. |
Because MS should be collaboritng with IW/whoever is making COD and get these problems fixed. COD Ghosts will most likely be the best selling title on the X1 for months/years to come, and don't forget It has timed exclusives on the DLC. Having the PS4 being a supperior version of the product is not good for MS. Also, have you seen the videos? The graphics are not exactly aweinspiring, there is no reason this game should not be 1080p.
Theres no need for me to be in denial: This is really bad for MS.
It's just that simple.
| DJEVOLVE said: Source: Gearnuke.com
Next generation is almost here. Curious to see how far the graphics have evolved. We compare Killzone Shadow Fall, Ryse and Crysis 3 to see how far the facial tech has evolved for games.
Before starting, let me explain why we included Crysis 3. Even though it is released on current generation systems, Crysis 3 on PC is still regarded as a benchmark for PC graphics. It gives high end rigs a run for their money on ultra quality. The facial tech is also one of the best from previous generation and truly shines on a PC. So keeping this in mind, let us begin our comparison.
Note: Click on each image to view in full 1080p size
Crysis 3
Lets begin with Crysis 3. The best work of Crytek(graphically) to date. It remains to be seen if Ryse can take the throne for Crytek in term of its graphics.
Killzone Shadow Fall
The lastest Killzone Shadow Fall trailer not only gave us a glimpse of the story, it also gave us a pretty decent idea of how the graphics fare for the game. While the character renders look stunning, seeing them in-game is even better.
Ryse
Another one of Crytek’s title here. Ryse is definitely shaping up to be one of the best looking next generation game. Its latest trailer was jaw dropping and looked great. It is the only game with the highest character polygon count so far.
Deep Down (Bonus)
While not included in comparison, we have decided to include Deep Down here. The original tech demo for Deep Down looked amazing for sure. But, as mentioned, it was a tech demo and not a game, hence we are not including it in comparison.
This would be EA's fault if it was anyone's. Ryse clearly looks the best out of all 3. |
What was the point of this?
This is art guys... paint art.
Credits to ypo.
Moderated,
-Mr Khan
iceboy151 said:
|
The people in this thread act as if the One can't achieve such things, It can.
| DJEVOLVE said: Source: Gearnuke.com
Next generation is almost here. Curious to see how far the graphics have evolved. We compare Killzone Shadow Fall, Ryse and Crysis 3 to see how far the facial tech has evolved for games.
Before starting, let me explain why we included Crysis 3. Even though it is released on current generation systems, Crysis 3 on PC is still regarded as a benchmark for PC graphics. It gives high end rigs a run for their money on ultra quality. The facial tech is also one of the best from previous generation and truly shines on a PC. So keeping this in mind, let us begin our comparison.
Note: Click on each image to view in full 1080p size
Crysis 3
Lets begin with Crysis 3. The best work of Crytek(graphically) to date. It remains to be seen if Ryse can take the throne for Crytek in term of its graphics.
Killzone Shadow Fall
The lastest Killzone Shadow Fall trailer not only gave us a glimpse of the story, it also gave us a pretty decent idea of how the graphics fare for the game. While the character renders look stunning, seeing them in-game is even better.
Ryse
Another one of Crytek’s title here. Ryse is definitely shaping up to be one of the best looking next generation game. Its latest trailer was jaw dropping and looked great. It is the only game with the highest character polygon count so far.
Deep Down (Bonus)
While not included in comparison, we have decided to include Deep Down here. The original tech demo for Deep Down looked amazing for sure. But, as mentioned, it was a tech demo and not a game, hence we are not including it in comparison.
ould be EA's fault if it was anyone's. Ryse clearly looks the best out of all 3. |
What does that have to do with this thread? No Crysis 3 looks better than Ryse. And while overall faces are better on Ryse than KZ some parts are better on KZ. Like the eyes. They look dead. But overall KZ looks better tha..... Wait. I see what you did there.
No one is thinking that this could be launch coding problems? Two different systems. Launch games usually don't show the strength of the consoles
CGI-Quality said:
This didn't really need a place in here, since there is an entire thread on it already. It also doesn't help the case when Ryse isn't a 1080p game, either. |
No this thread needed this, the numbers people throw around are so funny.
iceboy151 said:
|
Just let it happen, it makes him feel better. Besides we all know by now that screenshots don't equal graphics.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
.
