from what he is saying this is suppose to be something negative. maybe a ram reduction or something like that. This is bad new since I wanted a more powerful ps4 for later in the generation.

Can be related to that?

Some GAFers are saying this guy translate the DF articles and the article with the 20GB/s bandwidth for CPU is not translated yet... so there is a theory about they are talking about that.

But I don't think so...

Gamers are like scared cattle. Freak out over every single thing.

Should I know who that guy is that is posting these tweets? And why he has the scoop over the big websites?

It seems like it could be something insignificant, but this guy needs clicks for his site.

Well we already know that the ram runs a described due to the FFC listing. So it must have to do with reserving more for the os. But why would Sony make a statement about such things when they never told us how much it would use in the first place?

I don't think it's a RAM reduction.

I think they're running into timing issues with memory or possibly a memory flush issue.

Microsoft briefly hinted at the reasons why they chose DDR3 in their technical briefing and it had to do something with the amount (size of the chunks) of data being moved around, and the way DDR3 works, versus GDDR5.

Ethomaz please translate - my 3 years of high school spanish is failing me.

Just trying: Why don't you put up the story without sony's comment and his response is : In 99% of the cases we get "no comment" or we get ignored, but this was not the case. 

My spanish is crap.

Lockups at E3?

Don't tell me they made a machine where the CPU and GPU could access the same portion of memory at the same time.....

My guess is that the lack of eDRAM is causing some developers headaches, and that the setup of the system is resulting in a little less than perfect results that you would expect based on the power of the components. I doubt it will be a big deal, more along the lines of PS4 is not omnipotent.