shikamaru317 said:
roborad said:
shikamaru317 said: Homefront for me as well. Black Ops 3 looks like some kind of weird mash-up between Deus Ex and Titanfall, so I'm not sure why I'd want to play it instead of Deus Ex: Mankind Divided and Titanfall, lol. Treyarch should have made WaW 2. |
if it was WaW 2, I'd buy that baby in an instant.
|
Same here, it would have been a preorder for me. I'm tired of the futuristic setting for CoD since we just had Advanced Warfare last year. I've said this before and I'll say it again, Activision should have Treyarch making historic CoD's, Infinity Ward making modern CoD's, and Sledgehammer making futuristic CoD's, so that there'd be lots of variety between each year's CoD. Instead we'll end up with 3 futuristic CoD's in a row, watch and see if I'm not right. Next year Infinity Ward will release Ghosts 2 instead of going back to MW4 like they should, and Ghosts was already set several years in the future, Ghosts 2 will probably be set even further into the future than Ghosts 1.
|
5 cods in a row I think. Blops 2,ghosts,advanced warfare, blops3,ghosts 2.and I was a big supporter of future until I played advanced warfare. Single player is amazing, but multiplayer is really not that great with everyone flying around. I prefer blops 2 where it was slightly in the future but nothing major.