By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

Ah yes, our lord and master has returned, reclaiming the sacred throne of PC gaming discussion! Truly, history shall remember this day.

As for what I’ve been playing—been diving deep into the chaotic abyss of Deep Rock Galactic. Nothing screams supreme manliness more than space dwarves mining in the dark, shooting alien bugs, and screaming "ROCK AND STONE!" at the top of their lungs. The cooperative play is solid, the environments are randomly generated yet always engaging, and the sheer satisfaction of drilling through a cave system never gets old try traffic rider apk here is (Link removed by Pemalite)/ download it and enjoye the game.

But Fortune Summoners, huh? A 2D action RPG starring little girls fighting monsters on their way to school? Now that is peak masculinity right there. The real question is—how many times did Archie get absolutely wrecked before you got used to the controls?

Also, I gotta ask, does the game feature the ultimate RPG test—a fishing minigame?

Last edited by Pemalite - 2 hours ago

Around the Network

Alright, since I was dumb enough to mention it, I went ahead and did it.

Raster (11 games)_

  • 9070 vs 7900GRE_ 1440p = 16.8% ahead # 4K = 18.5% ahead
  • 9070XT ve 7900GRE_ 1440p = 32.7% ahead # 4K = 37.4% ahead

RT (9 games)_

  • 9070 vs 7900GRE_ 1440p = 25.7% ahead # 4K = 26.2% ahead
  • 9070XT ve 7900GRE_ 1440p = 49.7% ahead # 4K = 53% ahead

Something worth of note: the 7900GRE has 5120 shaders while the 9070XT has 4096. It achieves those leaked numbers with 20% less shaders.
I couldn't find how many shaders  the 9070 is supposed to have.

*Edit* Fixed the wrongly named 6900GRE to its actual name. Thanks Pem!

Last edited by JEMC - 1 hour ago

Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Who wants to try some demos?

https://store.steampowered.com/sale/nextfest

(this kind of explains why the Deckbuilding Carnival doesn't have its own festival)



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

JEMC said:

Alright, since I was dumb enough to mention it, I went ahead and did it.

Raster (11 games)_

  • 9070 vs 6900GRE_ 1440p = 16.8% ahead # 4K = 18.5% ahead
  • 9070XT ve 6900GRE_ 1440p = 32.7% ahead # 4K = 37.4% ahead

RT (9 games)_

  • 9070 vs 6900GRE_ 1440p = 25.7% ahead # 4K = 26.2% ahead
  • 9070XT ve 6900GRE_ 1440p = 49.7% ahead # 4K = 53% ahead

Something worth of note: the 6900GRE has 5120 shaders while the 9070XT has 4096. It achieves those leaked numbers with 20% less shaders.
I couldn't find how many shaders  the 9070 is supposed to have.

The number of shaders is only part of the story. It's the clockspeeds that are pushing the 9070 higher.
AMD is going for a smaller and faster and more balanced core so they can invest more transistors into things like RT and A.I, which is what they needed to do.

The 9070XT has 4096 pipelines @2400Mhz base, 2970Mhz boost.
The 7900GRE (I assume you meant the 7900GRE as the 6900GRE doesn't exist AFAIK) has 5190 pipelines @ 1270Mhz, 2245Mhz boost.

Almost a double in base clock and over a 30% increase in boost clock... But having all the ROPS, Texture Mapping Units, Geometry Units and more run at a higher rate is also helping.
Add in the new RT functionality and the 9070XT should be a much more efficient platform.

It's like when we went from VLIW5 to VLIW4, less shaders, but higher clocks, resulted in a more balanced chip.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--