the2real4mafol said:
Soleron said:
archbrix said: Both are stellar developers known for really pushing hardware and making great games. |
Metroid Prime 3 and DKCR didn't push the hardware, and metascores of 87 and 90 are not stellar.
Let's face it, they're known for ONE game - Metroid Prime - which was both stellar and pushed the hardware. Most key staff had left after Prime or Prime 2. They're living on a memory.
|
Since when is 87 or 90 a bad score? Also, Donkey Kong is a brilliant franchise, second only to Mario (which DK started as well)
|
What did Retro actually DO with DKCR? Took the game as is from SNES, put a 'NSMB' coat of graphics on it that frankly anyone could, and came up with some good level design for it. That doesn't show the team is capable of really standing out. They could have got Artoon to do it.
Or perhaps people's standards for what consitutes a praiseworthy studio are much lower now that the genre-defining studios of the past are gone, bought out or transformed?
I understand liking a game because you like it. I don't understand why there's a need to build up these kind of narratives for developers. You're just setting yourself up for disappointment, or even worse not realising how much better things could be; not letting the dev realise they could put so much more in a game.