| Turkish said:
|
Has Project Diva F been confirmed for release in NA for 2013? I knew strong rumors existed and Sega seemed primte to do so but never read official announcement.

| Turkish said:
|
Has Project Diva F been confirmed for release in NA for 2013? I knew strong rumors existed and Sega seemed primte to do so but never read official announcement.

| naruball said: Hm. So many awesome games, so little time (and money). Does anyone know why Ni no Kuni refuses to drop in price? Even GOW, which is selling better at the moment and came out more recently can can be purchased for at least £9 less in the Uk (36 for nino and around 27 for GOW). Makes little sense to me. Anyway, NIno, GOW, Beyond, Kingdom Hearts, and Puppeteer shall all be mine before the end of this year -_- |
http://www.amazon.com/Ni-No-Kuni-Wrath-Playstation-3/dp/B007A7UJ4S/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1365604829&sr=8-1&keywords=ni+no+kuni
Dropped in price in North America, I'd say for for it at $60 so $40 is no brainer for me, amazing game.

mutantclown said:
|
This is a legit point, since this thread isn't even trying to make one, merely bragging.I thought it was pretty self explanatory.Thread says "PS3 exclusives". An exclusive, as defined by PS3 fans since day 1, is only available on one platform, nothing else. Period.
Sly and MLB are PS3 games.......yes I noticed that, thank you. They are also on Vita. This by definition invalidates them, despite them also being on Sony hardware, it isnt a PS3 exclusive.Yet many PS3 gamers here and outside vgchartz still refer to these games, and last year still put games like Battle Royale, on PS3 lists, despite Vita having a version.
So my point is: Have PS3 fans changed the definition of an exclusive to a "PS3 game not on 360" and not "only on PS3"?
Heres the tricky part though, Sony has put you guys in a awkward position by bringing exclusives to the Vita, most recently the PS3/Vita game Guacamelee (88 on metacritic). If you go along with Sony and count these games as PS3 exclusives, you must then acknowledge games like Left 4 Dead 1/2, Alan Wake, Gears of War 1, etc. as 360 exclusives because it follows the same definition bending as counting a PS3/Vita game as a PS3 exclusive. But if you keep your old definition, then your forced to not acknowledge a growing number of exclusives that Sony puts on Vita. Your lists gets smaller and you can't talk up great games just because they no longer fit your definition of an exclusive.
This is a big issue to me, this ain't trolling. I would just like some clarity on where we all stand on what is now considered an exclusive. Is the term bended or not?
sales2099 said:
Thread says "PS3 exclusives. An exclusive, as defined by PS3 fans since day 1, is only available on one platform, nothing else. Period. Sly and MLB are PS3 games.......yes I noticed that, thank you. They are also on Vita. This by definition invalidates them, despite them also being on Sony hardware, it isnt a PS3 exclusive.Yet many PS3 gamers here and outside vgchartz still refer to these games, and last year still put games like Battle Royale, on PS3 lists, despite Vota having a version. So my point is: Have PS3 fans changed the definition of an exclusive to a "PS3 game not on 360" and not "only on PS3"? |
to me, you are in the right. ps3 only games should be counted just like 360 games only should be counted. however, in every list ever the pc-360 games still stayed on the list because honestly 360 would just get mauled by ps3 otherwise.

sales2099 said:
Thread says "PS3 exclusives. An exclusive, as defined by PS3 fans since day 1, is only available on one platform, nothing else. Period. Sly and MLB are PS3 games.......yes I noticed that, thank you. They are also on Vita. This by definition invalidates them, despite them also being on Sony hardware, it isnt a PS3 exclusive.Yet many PS3 gamers here and outside vgchartz still refer to these games, and last year still put games like Battle Royale, on PS3 lists, despite Vota having a version. So my point is: Have PS3 fans changed the definition of an exclusive to a "PS3 game not on 360" and not "only on PS3"? |
yeah, whatever. Buy a PS3 and play some games.
Wright said:
No game deserves a 10/10 in my opinion. For the same matter, no game deserves a zero either. |
Yeah, I agree with that. I especially feel that way about games with obvious problems getting perfect scores. I think it's incredibly misleading about what someone should expect from a 10/10. Dragon Age: Orgins and Fallout 3/NV were some of my favorite games from this generation, yet they were full of bugs and problems and I would say the same thing if either of them were given maximum points. I loved those games but I can completely understand any reductions they might receive.
Uh. I just realized how off-topic that was. Now NinPie is going to report me and it's all your fault! Take responsibility!
On topic, I hope Rain ends up being a memorable game. It's looking like a good year for PSN exclusives, as well.

Augen said:
|
Not yet, there was a facebook page that needed likes so do that to bring Hatsune Miku to the west!


Would talk about "PlayStation exclusives" then (including PS3/PSVita and maybe, just maybe PS4)
~Operation: FULL THROTTLE~ FFX|X-2 ETERNAL CALM+LAST MISSION HD Remaster is a global non-profit fan initiative to ask SQUARE ENIX to include "Eternal Calm: FFX-2 Prologue" and "FFX-2 LAST MISSION" within "FFX|X-2 HD Remaster".
facebook.com/OpFullThrottle
twitter.com/OpFullThrottle
Last of Us for me. Have not even heard of most of those.