Lol what? Outside their game devs, what do you mean?

And its obvious we can't compare a pc gpu with the one in a console. However that doesn't mean a pc low end gpu will turn into a monster card in consoles. PS3s RSX is comparable to the Geforce 7800 series. Those were high end cards when they came out. One would expect the next gen consoles to have derivatives of todays high end gpus like the 8870(rebranded 7870). The HD6670 is comparable to the 8800gt. Yes faster than the RSX, but don't expect the performance boost like we've seen PS1>PS2>PS3

Well usually the trend is

Weaker system = winner.

But a headstart could change everything depending on who has it.

It's the same GPU and not console will use it in the next gen.

Haha, its pretty funny to see everyone worried. If this turns out to be true, below is how powerful next gen consoles will be in terms of current graphics cards. Awesum Powa!

I for one hope this is true. It will silence all the annoying console power discussions on forums... 

The 8800 and hd6670 are no where close to each other. For starters no8800 can dx11 hell they can't even run dx10.1.

The hd6670 is much more powerful. However I expect Durango to cross fire 2. Don't expect a 680gtx type of card it won't happen. Hell imagine what current gens could do with 2 gigs of ram instead of 512!  Commen sense will tell us more than ram CPU and gpu are involved with consoles. Especially if kinetc 2.0 and that room thingy Microsoft just showed off. People bash Nintendo for making an expensive shell of a game pad that should have gone to more power yet don't think about the same issues with move and kinect. 

Dx11 won't matter when you have such a weak gpu. The 8800GT and HD6670 are very close. Look at this hierarchy chart http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/gaming-graphics-card-review,review-32416-7.html

The 6670 will be a 3 generation old low end card. The PS360 had derivatives of high end gpus when they came out. Unless Sony and MS bundle an expensive peripheral with their console, we'll have powerful futureproof consoles.

worst case scenario 5x wii u, very disappointing if true.

The consoles haven't even been launch yet and the graphics wars have already start...

Prove that nVidia games look better on nVidia cards compared to AMD. - (I.E. It simply isn't true.)
That has been debunked so many times it's not funny in the PC space.
Every now and then AMD might have better texture filtering and nVidia might get better Anti-Aliasing, but the difference is never "clear as day" and they catch up to each other eventually even without upgrading your hardware.

Sure, you get PhysX with nVidia cards, but you can also run that with AMD cards if you used hacked drivers and a secondary low-end nVidia GPU.
I am also yet to find a game I can't run on a single monitor with max graphics, triple monitor is a different story... But hell. It's allot of god damn pixels to render and nVidia would fold too.

Also, the reason why a super powerfull PC can't emulate a PS2 100% perfectly is simple. - It's not a PS2.
Emulation works on the basis that instead of modifying the game code to run optimised natively on x86 architectures, the PC uses software middle layers to "emulate" a PS2 environment where instructions are intercepted then the JIT compiler re-compiles the instructions to run in x86.
It's hardly an efficient process at any rate, the upside is compatability and potentially superior image quality, the disadvantage is of course performance.
Look at any exclusive PC game, it surely doesn't look like a PS2 game at any rate because it can take advantage of the hardware and doesn't need anything to translate the instructions.

Now, take a 5 year old PC, something along the lines of a Core 2 Quad Q6600 and drop in something like a Geforce 8800GT and a few gigabytes of ram. - You would be hard pressed not to run most games at console levels of image quality settings at 720P@30fps, provided it was a decent console port to begin with. (I.E. Not GTA IV.)
Heck, you could run Crysis on that with at-least 25-30fps. ;)

To put the Radeon 6670 in perspective for some though...
A Radeon 6670/7670 has about 3x more compute power than the Xbox or PS3's graphics chips, but does feature some image-quality enhancing features such as Tessellation and all the other pretties/optimisations that we got with the move to Direct X 10/10.1 and 11.

The other thing to remember is that Sony and Microsoft wouldn't be using the slow and bog standard for low-end cards, GDDR3 memory either and probably opt for memory with vastly more bandwidth, so it would still beat a cheap desktop Radeon 6670/7670 at any rate.

Also worthy to note is that Integrated graphics have reached a point of almost being at parity of a Radeon 6670/7670 both from Intel and AMD. A few more years and they will probably eclipse it.
But with that said, I highly doubt Sony or Microsoft would choose such chips, especially aging ones based on the VLIW5 architecture.

wiiU. wiiU would win.