Sheriffs who don't take "crap" from FBI agents are reprimanded, and possibly brought up on Federal charges. It's called the supremacy clause for a reason.

If anything, i'm mighty suspicious of how our military trains all these shady people and then just sort of lets them loose to do whatever. There have already been investigations about ex-military folks joining radical militias or racist groups.

In the sheriff's county he is the supreme executive officer, not the federal agent. He is HIGHER than federal agents in local matters. 

http://goshennews.com/local/x1996142009/Middlebury-dairy-farmer-Sheriff-stand-up-to-FDA

The Amish often generate public health hazards. A group of Amish in PA have recently gotten all pissy because their neighbors complained that they were dumping raw sewage on the borders of their property.

That's silly, why would somebody who has a gun and lives in a low homicide area be gunned down? It's the people without guns who become the victims of gun crime.  All I know is that my federal government wants to take away my right to due process of law (NDAA), free speech (Patriot's Act), property rights, etc. And if it weren't for my constitution and just as importantly, my right to bear arms, they would have by now. Gun prohibition would be the destruction of my way of life (American) and it is quite apparant. 

How the hell is that relevant? You're stereotyping the Amish after just reprimanding ex-military folks for doing the same to racial groups. How are you any less despicable by doing such? I know very well that the Amish pollute far less than your average American consumer, who might we note, have put all of us in a world ecological crisis.  

Your right to bear arms has dick all to do with what the federal government will or won't do to you.

Get this through your heads now, gun nuts. No military is scared of you.

That's silly, why would somebody who has a gun and lives in a low homicide area be gunned down? It's the people without guns who become the victims of gun crime.  All I know is that my federal government wants to take away my right to due process of law (NDAA), free speech (Patriot's Act), property rights, etc. And if it weren't for my constitution and just as importantly, my right to bear arms, they would have by now. Gun prohibition would be the destruction of my way of life (American) and it is quite apparant. 

Whats an AK-74 or a SCAR then? Coz I know guns and they're Assault rifles! The AK may be a sub-machine gun. Are they semi's?

Rifles.

unless they are used to attack somebody they arent "assault" anything. anyway as much as a misnomer as "assault rifle" is, it is usually defined as a gun with select fire capabilities. meaning either full auto(hold down the trigger and bullets fire until you run out) and burst fire (hold dont the trigger 3 or so bullets come out). I own a Ak-47, my bro owns a AK-74, they are both semi-auto, so like 90% of all other rifles, they only fire one bullet per trigger pull. Also they arent any different than a standard hunting rifle, other than they look cool, are much more durable, and reliable, but less acurate, and fire a slightly smaller round than most hunting rifles. and actually the Ak-74 is a standard full lenth carbine. the difference between an Ak-47 and Ak-74, is the 47 fires a 7.62x39, the 74 fires a 5.45x39. what you are thinking of is the AK-74u, which is a short barrelled version, and it short barrel guns are highly regulated, it requires a class 3 permit, finger prints, name put on registry, and a $200 tax stamp.

You want a ban on gun free zones? Great choice.

Why do you have that many guns? Does it make you feel like you have 'power'?

no, i have them becuase they are fun to shoot, i love going to the range. they are just a blast. i dont feel like i have power, i just know that if in the unlikely case that a bad guy comes after me, i do have a much better chance at defending myself, than without them. like i said, my glock is my homedefense weapon, but if i some reason cant get to it, my Ak, SCAR, or Ruger will have to sufice.

You can kill someone with a boiled sweet whats your point? Cars are more helpful to the world than an civilian with an AK! 

well thats debatable, true cars are useful, but why must somebody own one that can go over 65mph, way more than a ton, seat 4, have AC, have power locks, have GPS, power window, reverse cameras, etc. My Ak is a very highly versitile gun, it can be used for self defense, its good foor hunting, its round is big enough to kill most big game, will small enough to kill without mutilating smaller game, its highly dependable, its near impossible to break, it shoot reletively inexpensive ammo, so i can take it to the range, and pratice, and have fun.