What? nacho asked my opinion on his analysis and list and i just did it.

Yes, but you pretty much disagreed with everything he said. Something I disagree completely with.

People have asked me for my reasons and I will provide them.

Reason No. 1 why I suspect DT - He has evaded a question of mine. There is actually proof of this.

Reason No. 2 - He has made weird theories that don't convince me of his sincerity. 3 + 3 scum theory, being suspicious of zero and saying that at least one of the four people who attacked zero are scum by virtue of statistics. Saying 3rd party can try and mislynch this early, using "I am not as much experienced" excuse. That is silly coming from someone like DT.

(It's funny that prof quoted exactly the posts that made me suspicious of him.)

I am less suspicious of tabaha compared to DT. I also feel hatmoza is town, and prof might be town because of the way he argued - though he is neutral overall.

There may have been other reasons that might have slipped my mind. This two however, are the dominant reasoning for my suspicion on DT.

I am against lynching Miz, zero, ABC. I am ok with lynching ninetailchris and haxton, even though I am usually against lynching new players these guys haven't really shown any sign of interest towards this game.

I also think happy is playing weird. Joking around, doing nothing of importance.

People have asked me for my reasons and I will provide them.

Reason No. 1 why I suspect DT - He has evaded a question of mine. There is actually proof of this.

Reason No. 2 - He has made weird theories that don't convince me of his sincerity. 3 + 3 scum theory, being suspicious of zero and saying that at least one of the four people who attacked zero are scum by virtue of statistics. Saying 3rd party can try and mislynch this early, using "I am not as much experienced" excuse. That is silly coming from someone like DT.

(It's funny that prof quoted exactly the posts that made me suspicious of him.)

I am less suspicious of tabaha compared to DT. I also feel hatmoza is town, and prof might be town because of the way he argued - though he is neutral overall.

There may have been other reasons that might have slipped my mind. This two however, are the dominant reasoning for my suspicion on DT.

I am against lynching Miz, zero, ABC. I am ok with lynching ninetailchris and haxton, even though I am usually against lynching new players these guys haven't really shown any sign of interest towards this game.

I also think happy is playing weird. Joking around, doing nothing of importance.

If these are your reasons I shouldn't have bothered trying to get then out of you.

1) which question? And you evaded giving any evidence apart from this all game. Hypocrite. Besides if you wanted me to answer a question you should have asked me again. Clearly it isn't that important.

2) 3+3 theory is exactly that. A theory. We've had two scum teams in a smaller game then this. Why don't you like that idea Mantle? Second team perhaps? 

In regards to the Zero point, again, what's bad about it? It is very probable that one was not town. And even then, I said it wasn't an incredible lead, just better then the flavour hunters. Perhaps you didn't read it right, maybe you just didn't want to. 

I have no idea what you are referring to in the next part. Link me to the post. 

Orof quoted the exact ones tht made me suspcious? Well then, try explaining which ones and why. Just saying all of them collectively had a couple f scummy tells is not evidence. It's flannel. 

So basically, your two major reasons are either not explained or just bizarre that you don't understand them. 

As sad as it may be, no, I wasn't. If I had any relevant thoughts and/or suspicions, I would share them. But I didn't.

*clap* *clap* *clap*

Excellent conclusion! Too bad it's not how logic works. Unless for you "almost certain" is the same as "certain".

But hey, I might just as weel be spouting excuses. Now that you're onto me for one reason or another, nothing will matter, since I'm suspected~