By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 50 - Superheroes & Villains

I also don't like that ABC isn't actually contributing. He has been hit n running suspicion on happyD, though I agree with his post. Not much insight onto actual topic.



Around the Network
DarkThanatos said:
mantlepiecek said:

Except...you know that prof started it with his question, and not just me. My vote on you was done without any explanation - so no pressurizing the town without evidence there.

Whereas prof is concerned, he asked me, I answered. And I have "evidence" which is basically how you have answered back to my questions and your play this entire day.

So yes, I am not "pressurizing town without evidence".


Woop, another slip by you there mantle. I said originally you were pressuring me without evidence. You even repeated that back to me explicitly stating "putting pressure on you". Low and behold, you switch it around to "putting pressure on town". You've even said in the post you voted me without. Evidence- and what is denying town the chance to make up their mind if you don't give them reasons. All you have done there is Hiles up the suspicion on me (a side effect of being voted) without giving town any evidence to counter-agree on. 

Why are you so scared of one vote from Mantle which according to you has no evidence to back it up? Do you really believe that town is so gullible as to be swayed into voting you purely because one other player has? If it was that simple mafia would have won by now simply by putting one vote on someone and watching all the townies who are no longer in a position to make their own minds up (which is what you are saying is the case) put there votes on that player. I'm starting to consider the fact that my joke vote on you at the start was actually correctly placed after this interaction between you and Mantle.



Also, I'm not liking Radishhead's level of involvement in this. My first game with him he was pretty active but after last game I am not sure this is a sign of him being scum (he did something similar and turned out to be town). If he is town I'd like him to start getting involved more and maybe actually give proper opinions on things and question people >.>



Finally, some people are online. First off, I'd really like to hear about chris' supposedly "confirmed" players.

Second, what do the rest of you guys think of this? http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4912413



miz1q2w3e said:


Second, what do the rest of you guys think of this? http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4912413

Hat is currently sitting in my neutral pile. You make good points in your argument against him but I've seen Hat enough times to know he just plays like that. He likes going aggressive on people to guage their reactions and then stopping once he has found out what he wants. 



Around the Network

I reread the "conversation" between Miz and Hatmoza, and I don't think this is a sign of Hatmoza being mafia - a rapidash lynch was a pretty viable option at the time, and although the aggression could be a sign of Hatmoza getting defensive, I don't think he would break his cover over something so small (if he were mafia)



Click this button, you know you want to!  [Subscribe]

Watch me on YouTube!

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheRadishBros

~~~~ Mario Kart 8 drove far past my expectations! Never again will I doubt the wheels of a Monster Franchise! :0 ~~~~

radishhead said:
I reread the "conversation" between Miz and Hatmoza, and I don't think this is a sign of Hatmoza being mafia - a rapidash lynch was a pretty viable option at the time, and although the aggression could be a sign of Hatmoza getting defensive, I don't think he would break his cover over something so small (if he were mafia)

Alright then, thanks for the input.

@bold: I thought so too, at the time. Could you please tell me what you think of this? Do you buy it?



miz1q2w3e said:
radishhead said:
I reread the "conversation" between Miz and Hatmoza, and I don't think this is a sign of Hatmoza being mafia - a rapidash lynch was a pretty viable option at the time, and although the aggression could be a sign of Hatmoza getting defensive, I don't think he would break his cover over something so small (if he were mafia)

Alright then, thanks for the input.

@bold: I thought so too, at the time. Could you please tell me what you think of this? Do you buy it?

It's pretty much what I was expecting him to say - rather, that's the only thing he could have said to explain himself that wouldn't have made him basically guaranteed mafia. So the mafia games he plays on other sites work differently to ours; seems like a fair explanation - that doesn't mean I don't think he could be mafia at all however, just that I don't think he is for this reason.



Click this button, you know you want to!  [Subscribe]

Watch me on YouTube!

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheRadishBros

~~~~ Mario Kart 8 drove far past my expectations! Never again will I doubt the wheels of a Monster Franchise! :0 ~~~~

Yoshiya said:
DarkThanatos said:
mantlepiecek said:

Except...you know that prof started it with his question, and not just me. My vote on you was done without any explanation - so no pressurizing the town without evidence there.

Whereas prof is concerned, he asked me, I answered. And I have "evidence" which is basically how you have answered back to my questions and your play this entire day.

So yes, I am not "pressurizing town without evidence".


Woop, another slip by you there mantle. I said originally you were pressuring me without evidence. You even repeated that back to me explicitly stating "putting pressure on you". Low and behold, you switch it around to "putting pressure on town". You've even said in the post you voted me without. Evidence- and what is denying town the chance to make up their mind if you don't give them reasons. All you have done there is Hiles up the suspicion on me (a side effect of being voted) without giving town any evidence to counter-agree on. 

Why are you so scared of one vote from Mantle which according to you has no evidence to back it up? Do you really believe that town is so gullible as to be swayed into voting you purely because one other player has? If it was that simple mafia would have won by now simply by putting one vote on someone and watching all the townies who are no longer in a position to make their own minds up (which is what you are saying is the case) put there votes on that player. I'm starting to consider the fact that my joke vote on you at the start was actually correctly placed after this interaction between you and Mantle.


I'm not scared of it- notice I haven't told him to unvote me, or counter voted him. I was pressuring him for evidence as he has declined to give any about anyone nea enough. That's a valid technique, because scum will call someone else scum with little evidence in the hope other join in. 

But yes, even so I really do think several town are that gullible. Then when several people vote for someone less gullible players join in because they are tired of day one. Look at hatmoZa with his fuck it lets lynch the new guy. We have a lot of noobs this game, and just look how many votes Cjris got based on literally nothing. 

On the contrary I think Mantle has shown an error here. Prof picked up on it, as have I. Perhaps you need to re-read the interaction between mantle and prof as well. They were mainly discussing me anyway. 



So hyped for Rome 2: Total War

With me changing my vote off of miz should be clue that he isn't the person.

The reason why I don't say who is who is because we may have day killer.

That leaves 5 people.

I gave a huge clue in what I said. How can you not get what I was hinting too? Have you guys not been reading up?



"Excuse me sir, I see you have a weapon. Why don't you put it down and let's settle this like gentlemen"  ~ max