@nacho
I already put in some of my reasons. I'm not convinced by your summaries on players, and I think that more than being helpful, in this environment, it is very much harmful to label players as town or scum unless you have really solid evidence or "feels".

For example, as I said earlier, I didn't like how you 180'd on trucks when he said "i don't know what to think". That, in my book, is just a very very poorly informed read. Maybe it's correct, but not for the reasons you say it is.
As for myself, I have a natural inclination to lean scum with him early on, but I also try to reserve my thoughts on him because I tend to tunnel on his mistakes.
However, in this game I feel he's been a bit too meta, and I don't like his discussion with zero which led to a vote, a very defensible vote that really anyone could get behind.

You current play would suggest that you are town, based on your history of that one game in which you were town. I said then, and I still say now, that I don't think you respect your own analysis enough. I think you're too eager to qualify things based on your own rubric of what town does and what scum does.

I find your style of play is likely a meta response based on experience; ie, you play this way because it suits both your scum and your town game. It will likely be a while before I can get a read on you because I read players based on emotion, and you display none. However, factually speaking, you are calling two players town based on what I consider weak evidence, whom I actually find suspicious. So there's that to think about, if you will.

That's not really a great answer is it?

You said "for one", how about for another?

EDITTED FOR CLARITY AND BREVITY

At bold, just because you don't understand the concept of sleep doesn't mean the rest of us don't do it. I had to be up for school early in the morning and decided my education was more important than this game >.>

You of all people should know that FoS doesn't end up with a vote, if it did you would have voted everyone in the game everytime you have played (although you often make a good attempt at that). Also, I joined this so called "lynch train" (which only has one vote as far as I am aware...) after one post calling you suspicious. How is that joining a well-formed lynch train?

I have never voted Zero, I just put a FoS on him.

Also, your reasoning behind voting me is flawed, the only reason I bought up safeclaims was because in the three games I have played and the one I have hosted, the mafia has always had safeclaims, I was thus under the impression they were simply something that happened in the majority of games and thought it was right to assume they were in this game.

prof: I already put in some of my reasons. I'm not convinced by your summaries on players, and I think that more than being helpful, in this environment, it is very much harmful to label players as town or scum unless you have really solid evidence or "feels".
Why do you think providing reads is harmful? What harm has it brought so far?

prof: For example, as I said earlier, I didn't like how you 180'd on trucks when he said "i don't know what to think". That, in my book, is just a very very poorly informed read. Maybe it's correct, but not for the reasons you say it is.
I never 180'd on Trucks, actually. I said that I didn't know what to think of Trucks at first (that's what I meant by a "I don't know what to think" read), then, after he posted the list, called him town for reasons that I've explained a bit more thoroughly in my response to tabaha.

prof: However, in this game I feel he's been a bit too meta, and I don't like his discussion with zero which led to a vote, a very defensible vote that really anyone could get behind.
What do you mean by "a bit too meta"? And why is it a bad thing to make a vote that anyone could get behind?

prof: You current play would suggest that you are town, based on your history of that one game in which you were town. I said then, and I still say now, that I don't think you respect your own analysis enough. I think you're too eager to qualify things based on your own rubric of what town does and what scum does.
My method of scumhunting is different than yours. It doesn't mean that it is worse. Intent is based on looking why someone does what they do. When something furthers the mafia win condition, it means they are likely mafia. When something furthers the town win condition, it means they are likely town. It's not so black and white, of course, but it's a good place to start.

prof: You said "for one", how about for another?
Cut myself off in the middle of my train of thought. The other thing that I really liked from Radish is that he didn't use his no lynch vote as a reason not to scumhunt, which is exactly what Haxton did. Although he hasn't taken a definite position yet, he has questioned, he has provided the reads what he has had so far, and he has searched.

I'm starting to like this game. I'm not throwing baseless assumptions (because I'm new and cba to read previous 49 sessions), so I'm suspicious. 
I'm not claiming, since if I said I'm Robin I might as well be lying. But I'm not.

Or am I? _{Hint: No, I'm not}

As for lurking part, in all honesty I don't have the time to spend the majority of my day waiting for new posts here.

I'm new to this game (at least the forum version). And I don't believe in lynching on the first night - seems pointless in the long run, since the chances of screwing up are much higher than after something happens. Hence my vote for "No lynch" - if I knew there was such an option, I would vote it earlier.

Although I agree with those who suggest that Tabaha is probably mafia, I'm not confident enough to place a vote yet - and honestly, I'm suspicious of those who are.

It is mostly an opinion based on a personal point of view
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4906676 getting suspicious on people asking for the reason

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4906698 same

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4906712 HoS him but doesn't ask why

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4906840 I would love to hear his reasons

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4906979 not sure how to interpret this one

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4907128 telling me to focus on someone else. seriously? I can't just neglet people. Remember last round when everybody always negleted me when it was lynch time

ok these were form the first 2 pages @ 100ppp

I get the impression that you are being dishonest with your scum lists.