Yoshiya said:
mantlepiecek said:
DarkThanatos said:
Not at all, you misunderstand. If there are two scum factions, then one of them will probably be on Zero. If there is only one, then the third party may very well be on (because lets face it. Zero is an easy player to mislynch, don't think i need to explain why)
If scum of Zero's party is on him, they will be the one that votes him with a couple of sentences reason and pushes for other players. Usually with the aim of distancing themselves from the scum player, without actively pushing his lynch too hard.
Thats my line of thinking anyway.
|
I don't understand how you could come up with something like this. What makes you think a 6-man scum team is too big? What makes you think a third party will try and lynch someone when that is never really their motive (unless he is lyncher)?
|
Just like to add to that, even if there is a third party, how do you know it's no town aligned?
|
I'll address you two at once.
@Mantle. I think a 6 man scum team is too big, because to win scum could feasible have 6 townies left in play. Which would mean scum win with 12 players still alive. Pretty much the start of the last game. If you can get an entire couple of week long game out of the players left when scum win... I just dont see why Pezus would short change an epic game. I did say though, feel free to disagree with me on the numbers. And I have never played third party either, so I'm not entirely sure what their play would be, but if i was third party, I'd be happy to lynch anyone.
@Yoshiya. The whole reason for my number was based on the relationship between town and non-town. I would include third party town aligned in the town part.
But yeh, this is just my thoughts so far. Even though Zero and Prof are saying I'm an intelligent player, I've still only seen 4 games. This is just what I've gathered from those games, which is why I said in my original post about correcting me if a more experienced player in terms of balancing disagrees.