By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 50 - Superheroes & Villains

TruckOSaurus said:
DarkThanatos said:
Yoshiya said:
DarkThanatos said:

Oh the irony xD 

I am a watcher, and I saw Trucks at Prof's place, presumably doing the kill xD 

Vote: Truck

Why'd you come online, go offline and then come back shortly after Trucks posted? I see no reason for this if it was going to save you from a "mislynch" to claim straight away.

Also, who'd you watch Night 1 and why did you choose to watch them and Prof?

Because I leave the tab open all the time...

I closed it when I closed my browser, and then - shock horror- i came online again to check the thread, and subsequentially, posted. Personally, i'd have thought that was intuitive... 

 

Night 1 I watched Danne and got nothing. 

Night 2 I watched Prof because he was making big accusations, so i thought it was fairly obvious he would be a threat. 

Why the hell would you watch Danne on Night One?

What Trucks said.

Also, I'd like to know what your item is.



Around the Network
TruckOSaurus said:
DarkThanatos said:
Yoshiya said:
DarkThanatos said:

Oh the irony xD 

I am a watcher, and I saw Trucks at Prof's place, presumably doing the kill xD 

Vote: Truck

Why'd you come online, go offline and then come back shortly after Trucks posted? I see no reason for this if it was going to save you from a "mislynch" to claim straight away.

Also, who'd you watch Night 1 and why did you choose to watch them and Prof?

Because I leave the tab open all the time...

I closed it when I closed my browser, and then - shock horror- i came online again to check the thread, and subsequentially, posted. Personally, i'd have thought that was intuitive... 

 

Night 1 I watched Danne and got nothing. 

Night 2 I watched Prof because he was making big accusations, so i thought it was fairly obvious he would be a threat. 

Why the hell would you watch Danne on Night One?

*correction to previous post- He would be AT threat, rather then a threat.

and because, I predicted that one of the scum teams/SK (as i predicted multiple kills) would target one of the noobier players throwing around suspects to try and get a mislynch. I was right clearly, as Nacho was killed, I just targetted the wrong player. 



So hyped for Rome 2: Total War

Yoshiya said:
DT needs to roleclaim, now. Depending on his answer I have conclusive proof he is mafia.


Go on then, let's hear your "conclusive proof" 

I still think you're scum. You guys probably rolecopped me, saw i was watcher and have tried to set up a mislynch to elimanate a threat. Or you are just trying to elimate a player that has been on you. 

On the offchance that you are -despite it all- town, then you will know that my facts fit whatever your proof is.



So hyped for Rome 2: Total War

DarkThanatos said:
Yoshiya said:
DT needs to roleclaim, now. Depending on his answer I have conclusive proof he is mafia.


Go on then, let's hear your "conclusive proof" 

I still think you're scum. You guys probably rolecopped me, saw i was watcher and have tried to set up a mislynch to elimanate a threat. Or you are just trying to elimate a player that has been on you. 

On the offchance that you are -despite it all- town, then you will know that my facts fit whatever your proof is.

Wow, super defensive, getting worried are we?

@bold You really think I would set myself up for a guarenteed lynch by fakeclaiming just to get rid of you? You clearly overestimate your power to sway town's votes.

And yes, thus far your facts fit into my proof. However, it's currently Trucks word against yours and as you should know, I trust Trucks far more than you this game.



Yoshiya said:
DarkThanatos said:
Yoshiya said:
DT needs to roleclaim, now. Depending on his answer I have conclusive proof he is mafia.


Go on then, let's hear your "conclusive proof" 

I still think you're scum. You guys probably rolecopped me, saw i was watcher and have tried to set up a mislynch to elimanate a threat. Or you are just trying to elimate a player that has been on you. 

On the offchance that you are -despite it all- town, then you will know that my facts fit whatever your proof is.

Wow, super defensive, getting worried are we?

@bold You really think I would set myself up for a guarenteed lynch by fakeclaiming just to get rid of you? You clearly overestimate your power to sway town's votes.

And yes, thus far your facts fit into my proof. However, it's currently Trucks word against yours and as you should know, I trust Trucks far more than you this game.

Actually, you have been pushing for DT's lynch from the background from Day 1 now - what's the deal? Do you actually have some information that could help prove that he's Mafia, or is this just more of the same?



Click this button, you know you want to!  [Subscribe]

Watch me on YouTube!

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheRadishBros

~~~~ Mario Kart 8 drove far past my expectations! Never again will I doubt the wheels of a Monster Franchise! :0 ~~~~

Around the Network
DarkThanatos said:
TruckOSaurus said:
DarkThanatos said:
Yoshiya said:
DarkThanatos said:

Oh the irony xD 

I am a watcher, and I saw Trucks at Prof's place, presumably doing the kill xD 

Vote: Truck

Why'd you come online, go offline and then come back shortly after Trucks posted? I see no reason for this if it was going to save you from a "mislynch" to claim straight away.

Also, who'd you watch Night 1 and why did you choose to watch them and Prof?

Because I leave the tab open all the time...

I closed it when I closed my browser, and then - shock horror- i came online again to check the thread, and subsequentially, posted. Personally, i'd have thought that was intuitive... 

 

Night 1 I watched Danne and got nothing. 

Night 2 I watched Prof because he was making big accusations, so i thought it was fairly obvious he would be a threat. 

Why the hell would you watch Danne on Night One?

*correction to previous post- He would be AT threat, rather then a threat.

and because, I predicted that one of the scum teams/SK (as i predicted multiple kills) would target one of the noobier players throwing around suspects to try and get a mislynch. I was right clearly, as Nacho was killed, I just targetted the wrong player. 

Are you forgetting that Nacho is actually a mafia veteran just on a different site? Doesn't seem like something someone like yourself would do.

And seriously? You watched Danne for that reason? You've played as mafia enough times to know that "noobs" are easy mislynches so why the hell would you expect one of them to be targeted?



DarkThanatos said:
TruckOSaurus said:

Why the hell would you watch Danne on Night One?

*correction to previous post- He would be AT threat, rather then a threat.

and because, I predicted that one of the scum teams/SK (as i predicted multiple kills) would target one of the noobier players throwing around suspects to try and get a mislynch. I was right clearly, as Nacho was killed, I just targetted the wrong player. 

Or you chose Danne as your fake-watched for Night One since you knew he was very unlikely to have been targetted for real thus reducing the chances of someone calling you out of your bullshit.



Signature goes here!

Yoshiya said:
DarkThanatos said:
Yoshiya said:
DT needs to roleclaim, now. Depending on his answer I have conclusive proof he is mafia.


Go on then, let's hear your "conclusive proof" 

I still think you're scum. You guys probably rolecopped me, saw i was watcher and have tried to set up a mislynch to elimanate a threat. Or you are just trying to elimate a player that has been on you. 

On the offchance that you are -despite it all- town, then you will know that my facts fit whatever your proof is.

Wow, super defensive, getting worried are we?

@bold You really think I would set myself up for a guarenteed lynch by fakeclaiming just to get rid of you? You clearly overestimate your power to sway town's votes.

And yes, thus far your facts fit into my proof. However, it's currently Trucks word against yours and as you should know, I trust Trucks far more than you this game.

Not really, I have said that you are scum several times, both are plausable scenario's. 

And it wouldn't be a guarenteed lynch. I'm guessing you are almost certainly going to claim Tracker, which i call bullshit on, as you have been suspecting me all game, and you said I have been your biggest suspect, so you would have seen me target Danne night 1. Why track me last night, but not the night before? 

And you wouldnt have been a guarenteed lynch, because you would have been able to say "well, I only saw he visited a player, it doesn't say what role he used, I was just going from my suspicion" 

And now your just making bad points, because I haven't tried to sway them onto you with that post, because I know Truck is scum. 

And finally, you'd be foolish then. As you don't have a conclusive town read on either of us, you shouldn't trust either. 



So hyped for Rome 2: Total War

TruckOSaurus said:
DarkThanatos said:
TruckOSaurus said:

Why the hell would you watch Danne on Night One?

*correction to previous post- He would be AT threat, rather then a threat.

and because, I predicted that one of the scum teams/SK (as i predicted multiple kills) would target one of the noobier players throwing around suspects to try and get a mislynch. I was right clearly, as Nacho was killed, I just targetted the wrong player. 

Or you chose Danne as your fake-watched for Night One since you knew he was very unlikely to have been targetted for real thus reducing the chances of someone calling you out of your bullshit.

On the contrary, Danne was targetted by myself, so thats at least one player. Secondly, he could have been interpreted to be pretty suspect by players, so it wouldn't have surprised me if he was targetted. 



So hyped for Rome 2: Total War

DarkThanatos said:
Yoshiya said:
DarkThanatos said:
Yoshiya said:
DT needs to roleclaim, now. Depending on his answer I have conclusive proof he is mafia.


Go on then, let's hear your "conclusive proof" 

I still think you're scum. You guys probably rolecopped me, saw i was watcher and have tried to set up a mislynch to elimanate a threat. Or you are just trying to elimate a player that has been on you. 

On the offchance that you are -despite it all- town, then you will know that my facts fit whatever your proof is.

Wow, super defensive, getting worried are we?

@bold You really think I would set myself up for a guarenteed lynch by fakeclaiming just to get rid of you? You clearly overestimate your power to sway town's votes.

And yes, thus far your facts fit into my proof. However, it's currently Trucks word against yours and as you should know, I trust Trucks far more than you this game.

Not really, I have said that you are scum several times, both are plausable scenario's. 

And it wouldn't be a guarenteed lynch. I'm guessing you are almost certainly going to claim Tracker, which i call bullshit on, as you have been suspecting me all game, and you said I have been your biggest suspect, so you would have seen me target Danne night 1. Why track me last night, but not the night before? 

And you wouldnt have been a guarenteed lynch, because you would have been able to say "well, I only saw he visited a player, it doesn't say what role he used, I was just going from my suspicion" 

And now your just making bad points, because I haven't tried to sway them onto you with that post, because I know Truck is scum. 

And finally, you'd be foolish then. As you don't have a conclusive town read on either of us, you shouldn't trust either. 

Then you'd be wrong.