By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Mafia Round 50 - Superheroes & Villains

hatmoza said:
mantlepiecek said:

Not the ones you quoted.


You resorted to kid play. Above all the nonsense gibberish you put me through, this is what it comes to.

I hope for your sake you're scum, because this is just pathetic. It's funny, you said to prof 2 days ago that you didn't want to answer to someone you suspected 5 hours earlier, now you're making a no case out of things I already answered presently, and suspicions I had on you 48 hours ago, and are latching onto them for dear life.

Except it won't save your life.

 

Vote Mantle

That is not what I told prof. I told him that I didn't question someone who was a 5 hour long suspect.

It would make sense that I am trying to save my life IF you were even attacking me. But you weren't. 48 hours ago you didn't even know the reason to vote for me. You didn't remember them now, you didn't even know if you considered lynching me. You don't remember saying prof was onto something post either.



Around the Network

Bringing these up

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4914401

 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4914251

 

If anyone can find the other posts great, but one thing I noticed was Supermario's "Town"List

 

"Town: ABC, Miz, Nacho, Linkz, Hatz, Trucks, Prof"

Later he posts in response to the trucks/DT arguement

"This whole conversation has me intrigued. I was also going to bring up exactly what Trucks did. There is no reason anyone would say "second team" unless they themselves were on the "first team". As if the teams were numbered or something. Besides that, why did he even bring up the possibility of two teams? It seems very odd to me considering how rare it is to actually have two mafia teams."

 




19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*

you do realize you are just trying to drag this conversation to any direction that will make you look better, right?

I pretty much answered all your questions but here you are still complaining with not even one accusation of me being scum. You are playing safe. You made a half dozen posts before I responded to you and then you latched onto my response to lure me into whatever it is you're trying to lure me. And it just ain't working for you.

Let me recap. at the start of the game, you called me a town after a single post. I suspected you because of that. Afterwards, you and prof get into it. I voted for you for the lack of sense and steering you were trying to do then. So I went back and voted you. I've always had my reasons to be suspicious of you. Along with many other players who were also suspicious of you at that time (you and prof talk). -this also answers F-F's hot seat question as mantle was the runner up for lynch before 9TC incident I believe.

After that, I confronted 9TC and he fessed up about being the vigilante. You asked me why I voted you based on my interactions with 9TC, but I voted you before that even happened. You are not making sense. And every time I answer something you come up with another form of a question that I already answered in some shape or form In the last 2 hours!

So to answer again, I had a reason to vote and suspect you. I'm the type of person who forgets, what can I say. 9TC made me put you on the bench momentarily.

What else are you gonna try and spin now? Ask away.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

A Bad Clown said:

Bringing these up

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4914401

 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4914251

 

If anyone can find the other posts great, but one thing I noticed was Supermario's "Town"List

 

"Town: ABC, Miz, Nacho, Linkz, Hatz, Trucks, Prof"

Later he posts in response to the trucks/DT arguement

"This whole conversation has me intrigued. I was also going to bring up exactly what Trucks did. There is no reason anyone would say "second team" unless they themselves were on the "first team". As if the teams were numbered or something. Besides that, why did he even bring up the possibility of two teams? It seems very odd to me considering how rare it is to actually have two mafia teams."

 



Good. Something I can analyze tomorrow. I hate that I'm on that list but if there's scum in there it's Linkz prof and Trucks!

I'm pretty sure I'm town, and since ABC was ballsy enough to post this I think he's town (though I had a town read on you much earlier than that) and well, we know nacho's town of course.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

Mario's List


Mafia: Thanatos, Ninetails, Tabaha, FF, Radish


Town: ABC, Miz, Nacho, Linkz, Hatz, Trucks, Prof


Not sure: Spurge, Mantle, Zero, Happy, Yoshiya, Haxton, Danne

 

In the second case mario makes a case against DT and votes him. That tells me DT is definitely not scum, or rather not a scum mate of mario if we believe in the two mafia teams.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

Around the Network
hatmoza said:
you do realize you are just trying to drag this conversation to any direction that will make you look better, right?

I pretty much answered all your questions but here you are still complaining with not even one accusation of me being scum. You are playing safe. You made a half dozen posts before I responded to you and then you latched onto my response to lure me into whatever it is you're trying to lure me. And it just ain't working for you.

Let me recap. at the start of the game, you called me a town after a single post. I suspected you because of that. Afterwards, you and prof get into it. I voted for you for the lack of sense and steering you were trying to do then. So I went back and voted you. I've always had my reasons to be suspicious of you. Along with many other players who were also suspicious of you at that time (you and prof talk). -this also answers F-F's hot seat question as mantle was the runner up for lynch before 9TC incident I believe.

After that, I confronted 9TC and he fessed up about being the vigilante. You asked me why I voted you based on my interactions with 9TC, but I voted you before that even happened. You are not making sense. And every time I answer something you come up with another form of a question that I already answered in some shape or form In the last 2 hours!

So to answer again, I had a reason to vote and suspect you. I'm the type of person who forgets, what can I say. 9TC made me put you on the bench momentarily.

What else are you gonna try and spin now? Ask away.

I am not trying to spin anything.

However, I got suspicious when I realized that you didn't put much thought into voting me after prof interrogated. You made it look like prof was right about his thoughts and that you agreed with him.

You basically just voted me because you were suspicious of me earlier and a bunch of others voted me. Or that's what I get from what you said. You didn't really care to actually see what prof was saying, and voted because I wasn't making sense.

But I don't understand how you would even not remember voting for me. Whatever, it is possible I guess. Maybe you just didn't care for the lynch, and I guess that explanation would suit your play - you pretty much voted 3 people and unvoted and vote again.

The only person you actually critically questioned was NT and his day cop claim.



Name L-8 L-7 L-6 L-5 L-4 L-3 L-2 L-1 Lynch/hammer
Mantle  DarkT HappyD
 hatz            
Haxton  mantle  FF

         
DarkT Yoshiya


         
tabaha  miz  
           
Yoshiya zero                

 
Time limit  
 
   

HappyD votes Yoshiya
FF votes Haxton
HappyD unvotes Yoshiya and votes mantle
zero votes Yoshiya
hatmoza votes mante



theprof00 said:
Frankly, tabaha.
I think someone TOLD you that you looked like you freaked out.
I think THAT is why you wrote an apology of sorts in your very first post, like you were just really couldn't wait for day to start so you could come in here and talk about it.

I asked you just earlier today about it, and you said:
"after he got modkilled I efforted myself to analyze the whole situation."

But your opening post says:
"I shouldn't have voted for him when he said i was scum. I failed there and I admit it. I was panicking and facepalming way too much to do things properly. But point is, i can't think of a way to convince people that he was lying and making sure he wouldn't kill me the day after."

So, you couldn't figure out how to not only clear yourself, but how to ALSO keep yourself from getting shot day 2.
But in one of your own posts you said you would hammer yourself just so that you could laugh at town. Right? Seems a bit strange for a person panicking and worried about being SHOT the next day, to LAUGH at your own lynching.

"I shouldn't have voted for him when he said i was scum. I failed there and I admit it. I was panicking and facepalming way too much to do things properly. But point is, i can't think of a way to convince people that he was lying and making sure he wouldn't kill me the day after." (I know I just posted this, but it's here to keep emphasis)

You say this in reference to why your vote is on him.
But yesterday, you voted him because you said he was lying.
It just doesn't make sense to me that you were voting him as 'panicking', when as we've seen just with pezus last game, he KNEW mario was lying, and so voted him. That's not really panicking is it? You saw a claim that you KNEW was false, and so voted an obviously lying scumbag. Right? or no, wrong, you said, and again:
"I shouldn't have voted for him when he said i was scum. I failed there and I admit it. I was panicking and facepalming way too much to do things properly. But point is, i can't think of a way to convince people that he was lying and making sure he wouldn't kill me the day after."

Right here you're telling us that you voted him because:
1. You couldn't think of a way to convince people that he was lying
2. Make sure he wouldn't kill you the day after.

In response:
1. He's lying, Right? So why are you apologizing for your vote on him?
2. Who was going to kill who, WHAT day after? One of you was dead last night. It was either going to be you or him. If he didn't get modkilled, it was going to be you.

And then, it doesn't even really read like you thought he was scum.
Why would you be nervous about him KILLING YOU TOMORROW, if he's mafia?
You even said at one point "I'd claim, but I think it would help mafia, and I also have no guarantee that I'd even be believed"
Umm, what? You just said you didn't know how to keep yourself alive, yet you refused to claim?

I'm seeing a whole shitload of inconsistency in this story tabaha.

I think this is a rather good analysis of the whole situation! Even if 9TC lied about the investigation, which is very possible, this still speaks against tabaha. As far as I can tell he's still my favorite for day 2 lynch, but I'm not done catching up.



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

[Note for myself; can't read all the posts atm, can do in a few hours time]

PAGE 31#38



Click this button, you know you want to!  [Subscribe]

Watch me on YouTube!

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheRadishBros

~~~~ Mario Kart 8 drove far past my expectations! Never again will I doubt the wheels of a Monster Franchise! :0 ~~~~

Linkzmax said:
DanneSandin said:
miz1q2w3e said:
Guys, I believe what 9TC was saying before he died. All of it.

Vote: tabaha

I'm thinking like this: If we don't find anyone else to lynch (if we can't decide whom to lynch really) tabaha will always provide a good lynch, so why not have him as a "back up"? But on the other hand, that gives him time to sway people to NOT vote for him...

Him a-gonna HoS tabaha

How does tabaha "provide a good lynch"?

He's a good back up if we don't find scum this day, or the next day. 9TC pointed out him and Mario as scum, and he was right about Mario. True, 9TC also shoot innocent stefl, so that's a 50/50 scum/town distribution. But paying attention to tabaha's conversation with prof only solidifies my suspicions of tabaha.



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.