He was saying that if mantle flips town, then prof is lynched.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4915581

I found the link as well.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4915585

Another one.

I honestly don't remember why I voted for you exactly. I just saw you being so random. Even stopped making sense at times. I do remember saying that I should have stuck with my instincts about you being scum, and apparently I voted you.

You asked me earlier

"If that is the case then why did you vote me yesterday when prof was questioning me? The whole point of prof questioning me was that I "withheld" information. You also voted him."

But didn't 9TC claim vig slash investigator a lot after that? How are linking my vote on you, to what you suspected early, to what he claimed he was later. I only ever suspected what I suspected when 9TC claimed and lied. Your vote was before that.

What the hell are you trying to say here?

In one way or another, I answered your question. Are you satisfied?

If anyone else can word it better for me, please do. All I know is mantle is mixing (deliberate or not" past events with more curent events to form some kind of accusation against me that I really don't see.

And please excuse me for the long response, I was busy reading back when ABC's Wadufuq Did I Just Read" response to you and prof's also pointing out the lack of sense you're making. Apparently I'm not the only one who is confused by your post.

You know, the last time I was scum (last game I played) day 2, I went post digging for past events.

This just seems very odd.

If you go back early to the game when we were arguing, I accused you of being scum and made a case. And I refered several times later in the game to that. Why does it need an explanation now?

Prof ain't stupid enough to bribed and buttered up to jump to your corner the moment you remind him of that.

I was serious about lynching you though prof if he did flip town.

Because it is helpful.

I thought you said you always believed nt to be the davig/sk. I thought that there would be little sense to do so after he claimed, since he would be the only one who claimed the stefl kill. So I assumed you thought he was the dayvig before he claimed.

Wrong answer. I  ASKED YOU to go dig 'em up and you were more than willing.

Not the ones you quoted.

Seriously I'm getting sick of this dude.

Answering prof's question about "who suspected only the cop part with 9TC" I ALREADY SAID I never really suspected he lied about being the day killer or/SK/ Vig whatever AFTER HIS CLAIM, his investigation role is what I never bought.

You resorted to kid play. Above all the nonsense gibberish you put me through, this is what it comes to.

I hope for your sake you're scum, because this is just pathetic. It's funny, you said to prof 2 days ago that you didn't want to answer to someone you suspected 5 hours earlier, now you're making a no case out of things I already answered presently, and suspicions I had on you 48 hours ago, and are latching onto them for dear life.

Except it won't save your life.

Vote Mantle