By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 50 - Superheroes & Villains

theprof00 said:
Tabaha please do tell your weak case on dt.


1. I interpreted http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4915853 in a not normal way and i saw it as he wanting mantle lynched by saying: "why not both"

2. the video he posted here: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4915893 - bery very week

3. In somepost that i didn't wrote down I think he FoS'ed Hatz because hatz didn't trust 9TC (i'm not sure if this one is has the facts correct. I only have HoS@ hatz wrote down)

4. It seemed to me that he jumped too fast for 9TC lynch

5. It really looks like he's really fishing for roles.

6. When 9TC quoted his pm i think he put a vote on me, and only after he notices the strange wa about the formatting and votes 9TC

that's it



 

Around the Network

What do you mean you knew you were doing it wrong?



theprof00 said:
Tabaha who are your suspects and why


I'll need some minutes to dishwashing and then a lot of time to write the post with those. I also have to understand my handwrite so it will take some time



 

Final-Fan said:
tabaha said:
mantlepiecek said:

I have already talked about why I think haxton is scum. His vote on NT is the best proof you can ever have that he is scum.

Only his vote? According to my notes i noticed other people pretty hungry on getting 9TC lynched

Yeah but haxton did it in classic bandwagon style and without explanation IIRC.  Mantle definitely has reason for that suspicion.  In fact let me give Haxton a little extra incentive to defend himself: 

Vote Haxton

But let's not get too close to lynching until he's had ample chance to do so. 

Why, thank you.

As for the "no explanation" part, I'm not used to taking extensive notes - thi is my very first forum mafia game ever, and also the first time seeing people taking all this so seriously. Sorry about that, but don't expect many vital contributions from me. And I'm sorry that being irked by his overly and pointlessly cryptic words is not enough for a reason.

Or I was simply defending fellow scum by drawing your attention to my noobish behaviour/bandwagoning. You never know. Hm, poking holes in my own reasoning does not look like the best idea...



[01:33] <@Palom> Question: Biology: Which major terrestial biome is characterized by very cold winters and mostly herbacious plants? (1)

[01:33] tsundra

mantlepiecek said:

The bolded isn't wrong imo at least.

DT said he is suspicious of zero - then zero said that at least one person amongst 4 who were pushing him were scum - then DT said that it is possible through statistics since there are 1 scum out of 4 players as a ratio - I asked does that work even if zero was scum? LIke he thought at the time - He said it is possible scum of opposite factions/3rd party serial killers may vote other parties since they try and get a mislynch - Said he didn't know how 3rd party players play since he has never been 3rd party so he maybe wrong.

This is in short why I think DT is scum. That is apart from what he said later on - he asked if I was on the second team.

When did I say I was suspicious of Zero before then. Quote me when I said that. 

Because as far as I can remember I only mentioned Zero being scum when you asked "what if Zero is scum". 

You are lying Mantle. I do not like liers. 



So hyped for Rome 2: Total War

Around the Network
theprof00 said:
What do you mean you knew you were doing it wrong?

I have enough intelligence to notice that i'm not acting the best way



 

1 why do you think he wanted to lynch mantle? Not saying you're wrong but why would he want to?
2 ill respond to that later maybe
3 why do you think he didnt trust hatz?
4 why do you think he wanted to lynch 9tc
5 no comment
6 whats this about formatting and voting 9tc?



tabaha said:
theprof00 said:
What do you mean you knew you were doing it wrong?

I have enough intelligence to notice that i'm not acting the best way


so why are you only telling us this now and not then?



zero129 said:
Yoshiya said:
I have a helluva lot of posts to catch up on but I saw that 9TC claimed the day vig so;

Unvote: 9TC

I'll try and catch up sometime later, off to school now.


Wow, really wow.

After such a big deal being made out of me night posting last time when i was drunk how the hell could yoshia make the same mistake??.

How could it be no one has said anything about it?.

Could it be a scum Yoshia (I have already pointed out why he is one of my suspects earlier on day 1 but this just confirmes it for me imo)

could of seen how i was confirmed town by doing that last time? and thought it would also confirm him as town in this game as people wouldnt think mafia would do such a thing?.

its not like it was just posted as soon as we hit night time. He wasnt drinking etc etc imo this is a slip from him.

Ill be keeping my vote on yoshia as imo unless someone else comes along who i think is more scummy he is the best target.

Also Tabaha cos of what ninetails said.

Alot of people where very fast to jump on ninetails knowing well he had a town role as was pointed out by me and others

Anyway Yoshia good job of night posting and removing your vote on Ninetails in the same post just to make yourself look good and more town like, but imo this was your worse mistake.

I checked the end of the thread and saw a table from the co-mod listing the votes on people and a post by Spurge above it. I thought the Day was still happening. I totally accept I was in the wrong and have already told Pezus I will make a point of checking harder in the future. As to why this makes me scummy, I really don't see it...



mantlepiecek said:
Final-Fan said:
mantlepiecek said:

The bolded isn't wrong imo at least.

DT said he is suspicious of zero - then zero said that at least one person amongst 4 who were pushing him were scum - then DT said that it is possible through statistics since there are 1 scum out of 4 players as a ratio - I asked does that work even if zero was scum? LIke he thought at the time - He said it is possible scum of opposite factions/3rd party serial killers may vote other parties since they try and get a mislynch - Said he didn't know how 3rd party players play since he has never been 3rd party so he maybe wrong.

This is in short why I think DT is scum. That is apart from what he said later on - he asked if I was on the second team.

If you separate out "there may be two mafia factions" from "I (DT) suspect zero is on one and it's likely someone who voted him is on the other", then the two mafia factions theory isn't highly improbable at all IMO. 

If you don't separate them but only consider it as a whole, then yeah it is pretty convoluted.  But there are plently of players that settle on a suspicion and do weird mental gymnastics to try and justify it.  If anything it's a town trait since scum don't normally have reason to stick their neck out going after a lynch. 

In fact, what did his math about the likelihood of mafia being on any given lynch have to do with anything at all? 

Why would he suspect zero is one and someone else is on another? He was using statistics, it was pure mathematics without inclusion of feelings about other players who were pushing for zero.

He said it is possible that someone is scum from the 4 who pushed zero - after saying he is suspicious of zero. To me that means he thought there are 2 scum teams before this. But how and why?

Him saying he doesn't know how 3rd party players play is really really weird in my eyes, since he did say that ninetails could be sk who changed his PM during day 1.

I specifically asked him how is it that he thinks a scum player will try and push suspicion on his teammate on day 1 - to which he replied it could be possible that there is 3 + 3 scum or an SK trying to mislynch. That is about as far-fetched as anything. He had obviously not thought much about it.

He then later said that 3 + 3 scum theory is just a theory. But why make that theory? And then to accept it as truth, and use it along with statistics for supporting zero's claim that there is one scum pushing for zero out of 4?

Quote me where I said I suspected Zero was scum. Your entire case is based around that I suspected Zero beforehand, and I don't recall saying any such thing. 

Statistics is a useful tool. You are making it sound like I used purely statistics and was certain from it. Forgive me if i am mistaken (I'm not) but you even said yourself "From my calculations I would suspect the scum team to consist of DarkThanatos, Haxton and Tabaha"  I even said specifically it was a weak case against the 4 players, just that it was stronger then the flavour hunters. I then voted Yoshiya out of those four players because of his other points, and guess who is now nipping at my heels like a wounded dog... 

You specifically asked me... You are indeed correct. You asked me a question, and I answered how my theory would still work under your conditions. IT STILL MAKES LOGICAL SENSE. 

It is just a theory. I did not say it was a fact. and why make a theory? Why make a suspicion? Why voice your scumspect? Why do anything? 

MANTLE. YOU USE YOUR BEST GUESS AS SUPPORTING FOR EVERYTHING YOU DO. It was my best guess as to the situation, and I still maintain that opinion. It would make sense if i was to use my thoughts to support my accusation's don't you think? 




So hyped for Rome 2: Total War