Well Prof, you haven't really left me much to work with. Just a couple of things I think you missed :P

@Bolded. For balancing purposes? You've already claimed ignorance of the team sizes. How can you comment about balancing unless you know more then we do? For all we know it could be counter balanced with a strong town team or a weak scum. Do you know any more information about scum's strength?

If you do, its because when someone makes a point at you, you respond with blinding misunderstanding/denial of their points, so they have to do it 19 times. OR people have to press you to give them actual quotes. 

Finally- Notice how Prof will make several points at once afainst Mantle. Mantle will respond to 2/3 and ignore the rest because he knows he can't argue against it. 

It is the same thing. SK is a power role as is the day vig, the only difference is the alignment. When you asked if I knew he is a power role, I guessed that he could be the one who killed stefl. So the day vig part. However, I was not sure if he was Day SK or even the person who killed stefl, really.

I later thought he could be town by virtue of haxton's vote. That is the only thing that even made me consider him as a possible mislynch setup.

I have replied to every point of prof as far as I know.

And as for the balancing part, I think an overeager day vigilante who cannot be blocked, bussed, or manipulated is overpowered. That point was introduced by trucks, and I thought it was a good one.

I'm a bad player, since going with "don't speak unless you have something valuable to say" (well, sans the bad jokes) policy is not the best idea in this game. Either bear with me or get me killed.

What I do know is that for me this game is getting somewhat stale and I believe that it would be healthiest for everyone if something new has happened. Going for time limit will be very bad news for 9TC, who admitted to being vigilante (though only under severe pressure - and his still unexplained claims about two mafia still bug me a little), so I suppose I Unvote.

But hey, now I have a spare vote! I can't just go and do nothing after saying about game going stale. I suppose I might as well scumbuddy prof... I mean, notice that I understand prof and DT's reasoning regarding mantle. I also love his nigh-instant suspicion of new people who don't know how to play. We are the easiest targets for starters, after all~

So, in conclusion I Vote: mantlepiecek

Sorry, I meant to ask 'why didn't you tell the town of your suspicion that 9tc might be an SK'.

I believe everyone who is on my lynch today to be scum, except for Miz whom I consider blundering townie.

Prof is most likely scum because of his questioning that is pretty much intended to try and pain suspicion on me. He doesn't consider my answers at all. He has no intention to, that I realize.

Hat because he said nothing before voting. I also think he voted nine, he has shown signs of jumping on lynch trains. From what I know from meta this also matches with his scum play.

Haxton and DT I have already explained.

This is also the reason why I still feel confident that I will not be lynched. I will fight.

Miz has come out quite well off this.
Happy D not so much. Would like to see him give a bit more reason behind his town view of mantle.
Spurge- please PLEASE don't start posting as much about happyD as we have about Mantle right now. Still give a brief reason for your scumpicion?

Because when I thought of that nine wasn't the one I was thinking. I was thinking that there might not really be a day vig, he could be a day sk.

Nine came into my imagination a little later. I don't exactly remember. And I was busy with DT and you.

All I care for is a mantle lynch and scum flip and the rest will speak for itself. I have no time to tell you how wrong you are. In the case mantle doesn't flip scum, we go after prof. It's that simple. But I think prof is onto something and he wouldn't be stupid enough to go after mantle this strongly as scum.

You may have had other "exact reasoning", but you were definitely using the "only scum would consider two factions" argument as if it was a good argument in support of your case.  Which it's not, IMO.