For example, you say: SM128 says he trusts stefl, and we know this is bullshit because stefl says sm128 is scum, which sm128 (wasn't at the time) agreeing with.

But of course sm128 likely meant he trusted that stefl was town and telling the truth, not that stefl's inferences were infallible (what he deduced without exactly knowing, based on what he did know from his tracking).

So your argument was dumb. So dumb that I'm not totally sure you were serious with it. Only it seems you went on in this line of thought for multiple posts so you probably were serious. This is such a weaksauce argument that if (more like when, considering his last post) he does flip mafia I'll be looking at you for possibly bussing your doomed scumbuddy. But I'll certainly entertain arguments to the contrary.

Oh I see. And now this question: How likely is it to mario not being the only one visiting prof? Probably near zero.

@Final-Fan I made some mistakes due to not having enough knowledge but mario ended up shooting himself

Right, so now my reason for being scum is because i have good syntax and grammar? 

I understand that you aren't a first language english speaker (i think??) But seriously. What!?

Well, I'm not scum, and whenever i enevitably get lynched or killed you'll all see that. 

On that list Linkz is the only player that I think could be scum, and thats mainly because treating him as town can be a fatal mistake- he is too good a player to fully trust him. (Though that Pezus vote has me curious). 

Smeags just hasn't voted much content, but he rarely does. Either way he is definately not high up my scum list. 

and tabaha's arguments are just laughable. The only vaguely scummy thing about him is his poor arguments (mainly against me by not reading my posts properly/at all, yet still making accusations). 

The thing about this list which disturbs me the most is the complete lack of mention Nacho, Spurge or Rol gets. Most people have at least one of them on their list and you dont have any?! Even if you flip town, I still wouldn't trust this list because it isn't inclusive, and just grabbed on the suspicions of people posting while you were dying. It just seems like  a desperate attempt to de-rail your lynch. You even admitted yourself you were desperate. 

Finally, just in case Mario's own vote doesn't count, or someone is silenced.

Vote Mario

My money is you'll flip scum and we can begin to investigate who you left out of your scumlist..

Retaggin

A good scum wouldn't just list townies as they die. You know they are not trustworthy the moment they flip but you can't just take that to mean that everyone on their list is effectively confirmed town. Also, your reasoning as to why his list is bad is terrible. Just because he doesn't have the people you think are in the highlight doesn't mean that his list is bad, it just means he has seen different things to everyone else. I'm only bringing this up because I don't want you to go off on chasing people have different ideas to the rest of the people in the game, that gets town killed late game.

Also, before you die can you explain why your list is what it is Mario? If you have already done this can you link me to the post in which you did so.

His list is a bunch of scum flailing; it's not really worth analyzing right now. We have plenty to go off of with how people acted to worry much about that.

I know my arguments aren't good. I know it already, but I think I was somehow right. I was analysing and making a theory based almost only on what mario wrote. And somehow I think I made him commit some mistakes. Even if my arguments were stupid they applied enough pressure on him. I have no regrets on thias

Good catch. Although third parties in general are not completely out of the question, we just know that we can win with them if they exist.