Gotta say, this is a pretty poor example.
That game he first went after happy D with a side of Rol, even though you antagonized him.

Sorry that I never played as scum

Well, your post doesn't contribute much to a town picture of you if you hail your glorious scum actions as contributive to town. You don't need to play into pezus' hands, regardless if he failed with the attempt to validify his "prof is scum" claim.

The best way to do it is just post, because then he can't call you out for lurking and his claim is worthless anyway, and you are a better asset to town.

Also regarding your earlier reasoning as to why you might lurk, people never listen to the dead, otherwise the MLP round might have ended up better (means zero would've got lynched and town would've won), but these are things of the past and you have to make the best of this game, and not whine about past games and how much town sucked there.

So you say you are playing as scum now ( ¬‿¬)

It's been my opinion from my first post, iirc, that nacho is suspicious. I didn't like his "list of town players", and his calling spurge and manbear hard reads.

Like I said, it's either he's (as town) trying to be impressive by coming to accurate conclusions very quickly, or he's trying to get reads (which is interesting that he says me questioning him gives him a town vibe)....OR
He's scum trying to make friends/seem important to keep around

The scum scenario appears to be the most fitting, as I don't believe he was trying to get reactions- this is based on his defensiveness to people questioning his conclusions; ie, actually using quotes to give foundation to his arguments where the posts he uses are, at best, superficial.

In addition to what Stefl said, I don't think you've been paying attention to MBP's style.  

You are not following the discussion.

Pezus questioned my whereabouts, saying I might be scum. I then asked what he was talking about and he said that when I lurk, I am scum, evidenced by the last time I was "at a tournament/convention". I provided the last time I was at a tournament/convention, saying I was a third party who posted a lot and was suspected. This post was meant to counter his supposition that the last time I was "at a tournament/convention, prof was scum". IMO, I was a third party, which negates his point.

Instead, he counters saying I was scum, which he said in order to validate his original post. Yet, even if there was argument, he said the very last time I was scum I lurked as well. I don't think pezus actually believes I was scum in game of thrones. I think he's just trying to post whatever it is that helps him not look like a hypocrite. In fact, I just looked through that game and after rol claims third party, pezus actually encourages Rol to kill other suspects. (Fact: in the game, Pezus treated a claimed so-called "third party scum" as if they were town. ) I mean, if he actually DID believe I was a "scum that had to go", then why would he feel it necessary to bring up the OTHER last time I was scum? Did he feel like his evidence was weak? Yes, I believe so.

And so now, in that post you linked to, I was somply clearing up teh facts, which hilariously enough, HE, BY VIRTUE OF HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE THIRD PARTY ROL, INHERENTLY AGREES TO.

no. i said that i never played and that i'm not playing scum

From other games or just from this game?

LIAR :D you played scum often enough on IRC-Mafia

well this doesn't get us anywhere... so maybe I should just stop it