I've played Mass Effect on 360. When i saw that ME2 will also be available for PS3, i waited for the PS3 Version to arrive. And heck, Shepards first PS3 departure sure was glorious, wasn't it?

But who in the name of fuck is responsible for that pile of shit that is ME3? I mean, the game itself has an epic feel to it, but all those Framerate problems, the animation errors in cutscenes (where it looks like Char's spawn into the camera a second to late) and on top of all that, a few freezes here and there...

How could they fuck it up so badly? i mean, seriously.. i only payed 30€ for it, but even then, i kinda feel robbed right now, just for the simple fact that the predecessor worked far, far better on the same system, with the same engine.

...*Puke*

I didn't notice any of those problems. I was generally very impressed with ME3.

BTW, if you plaed ME on 360, why didn't you import your save into ME2 on 360 so you could do the same for ME3? That's what I did and it was great.

i favor my PS3 over my 360, don't ask me why that is, its just that way. (Brand loyality maybe? i had a blast with the PSX, and the same goes for the PS2) i've heard that the 360 Version of ME3 is superior to the one for PS3 (did hear that AFTER i've purchased the PS3 Version and noticed all the problems) so i guess thats why you had a better experience. =)

I played ME so of course I was disappointed with ME2 and ME3, they are terrible.

With ME2 PC I had some odd glitches.

Like suddenly warping into the ceiling twice.  And a few clippings during cutscences.

I need to get ME3 after I finish the Shadow Broker DLC.

I didn't have major problems with ME2 on PC. Haven't played ME3, will do after a couple of years (busy with old RPGs. Noble, huh?).

Haven't tried any ME on consoles.

mass effect 2 and 3 favourite games of all time. so what the ending was a little odd. wasnt as bad as everyone makes out but its about 20 minutes in over 100 hours gameplay. crazy how some people think