Eagles are such a disappointment, Vick sucks
Who will win the Super Bowl? Part II | |||
| Denver Broncos | 24 | 18.75% | |
| New England Patriots | 14 | 10.94% | |
| Houston Texans | 1 | 0.78% | |
| Baltimore Ravens | 29 | 22.66% | |
| Glasgow Rangers | 3 | 2.34% | |
| Atlanta Falcons | 4 | 3.13% | |
| San Francisco 49ers | 29 | 22.66% | |
| Green Bay Packers | 4 | 3.13% | |
| Seattle Seahawks | 6 | 4.69% | |
| I am a wuss, but I want to see the results. | 12 | 9.38% | |
| Total: | 126 | ||
| ljigga said: Eagles are such a disappointment, Vick sucks |
The NFC East is usually the most over hyped division because it is a huge market. This division is the biggest question mark in the league on who will win it. I am ready to jump on the Skins hype train.

Wow the redskins are looking good on defense and offense....they put up 40 points in NO lol
chocoloco said:
I have not had chrashing in the thread. Oh damn, the only good non-blowout game is Jaguars-Vickings. Going to overtime. Great the Chiefs lost!!! |
not just this thread but generally in forums,maybe its just me and chrome,threads seem to go all green and black too often for me
anyway detroit came back,saints couldn't,most people had vikings anyway,you must be looking forward to denver and manning later,going to be too late for me though 2:00 am over here
My Eagles looked terrible. Vick throws 4 INTs. Though he came through in the end, that was one sorry ass game. At least the Phillies walked off for the second game in a row.
I'm scared to check my bracket right now. Hopefully Rol will do it for me.
| zuvuyeay said:
anyway detroit came back,saints couldn't,most people had vikings anyway,you must be looking forward to denver and manning later,going to be too late for me though 2:00 am over here |
I am not having problems with chrome on my tablet and no problemswith firefox on my labtop.
I will not be on for the Denver game becase it is the most important one for me for sure. The Broncos got so many night games this year it would be hard to watch them in Gb and Europe.
Can we all agree we want Green Bay to lose?

chocoloco said:
I am not having problems with chrome on my tablet and no problemswith firefox on my labtop. I will not be on for the Denver game becase it is the most important one for me for sure. The Broncos got so many night games this year it would be hard to watch them in Gb and Europe.
Can we all agree we want Green Bay to lose? |
i'm backing GB sorry and come on tampa bay
Alex Smith to Randy Moss....a sign of good things to come...but more importantly the Packers are loosing!!
| noname2200 said: I see the point, but I also see going 16-0 as akin to having a perfect game in baseball: skill's a huge requirement, but luck plays a big factor too. If we reran that season with the exact same teams, I can easily see them dropping two or three games. They had, what, four or five games decided by three points or less? They also had roundly-terrible division opponents (4-12 Jets, 7-9 Bills, 1-15 Dolphins), which made for six more-or-less gimme games. None of this is to detract from their accomplishment: it's near historic for a reason. But they were a bad break or lucky play away from dropping some of those games, just like many teams are on any given Sunday. |
The only close games were the Ravens and the Giants in the regular season. Everything else was a blowout or close to one. I admit that we were lucky to beat the Ravens and the only reason we did was because the coaches called a horrible timeout. The Giants though was all Tom Brady throwing incredible deep passes and bringing the team back from being down.
The only superstar brady has ever had at reciever was Moss and he only came to the team late in his career. Everyone else has been no names that Brady made good with his amazing passes.
Stop acting like Brady had nothing to do with the Patriots success.
The definitive evidence that video games turn people into mass murderers
Quick recap of the games:
Adrian Peterson, strong return.
Texans, still a run heavy team.
Bills, complete trash.
Patriots dink and dunk plays will NOT help them beat the real teams. The Titans with Locker under center are awful and should have been blown out. Pats will get a reality check soon enough.
Jets, good showing.
RG3 is the real deal. Saints have some serious defense problems.
Browns are awful, and the Eagles barely won.... I do not expect Vick to repeat any more poor performances like that though.
The Era of Decker begins tonight, and right now my Packers are lookin stale....the hype is too much to live up to right now. If they lose, I would usually be angry, but not in this case. An L can humble them and refocus their game. As long as they make playoffs they can lose 4 or 5 games (no divison ones though!)
Matt Ryan, made a statement today.
Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. " thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."