By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 44 - Ghostbusters!

NoCtiS_NoX on 06 August 2012
WiiBox3 said:

This again. Why in the Holy Father's name should we condemn you for being stressed. Just refill your prescription.


My ps3 YLOD for cryung out loud. I am really in a bad mood right now. I can't handle provocation and insults right now. I can't think straight. If you guys have a hearts. Just give me time-off that's all I am asking. A day or two is all I am asking.



Around the Network
NoCtiS_NoX on 06 August 2012

UNVOTE



theprof00 on 06 August 2012

Noc, just calm down. You won't be lynched, just ignore them.



Wonktonodi on 06 August 2012
NoCtiS_NoX said:
spurgeonryan said:

So Noctis made that famitsu thread about 6-8 hours ago. His only limit seems to be that he has to say pills but for some reason did not this last time. Where has he been? His whole deal this game has just seemed like some big ploy.

FoS NoCtis


@mario

Were you told in your PM that you could claim miller?

As miller what is it that you will do for town or willing to do?

I am not post restricted. I never once acknowledge it but pill is really essential for me. I can't say more becuase it is not allowed. 

So Pezus is one of them.

@spurge

are you one of those people aswell that want SAK replaced?

while trying to stay current and catch up this stood out to me since he just claimed



theprof00 on 06 August 2012
Wonktonodi said:

while trying to stay current and catch up this stood out to me since he just claimed

And what did you decide from that post?



Around the Network
Wonktonodi on 06 August 2012
theprof00 said:
Wonktonodi said:

while trying to stay current and catch up this stood out to me since he just claimed

And what did you decide from that post?

I see a contradiction. Fake claims are much more likely to get contradictions than real ones.  So I'm now leaning scum on nox. however I still have a few hundred more posts to read. (700 down)



Wonktonodi on 06 August 2012
theprof00 said:
NoCtiS_NoX said:

 

Prof is scared.

 

VOTE: Linkz

it's easy prof.

 

haha, it's not that. Voting actually carries a consequence if I do it.

you voted radish early day one?

if you adress this contradiction I am sorry

otherwise shame on everyone



Wonktonodi on 06 August 2012
theprof00 said:
This is why I removed my vote immediately at the beginning. I wasn't paying attention and joke voted. Thankfully day hadn't started yet.


I will read much further then befoer more commentsor questions, but I will say I am very sceptical of prof's claim.



theprof00 on 06 August 2012
Wonktonodi said:
theprof00 said:
Wonktonodi said:

while trying to stay current and catch up this stood out to me since he just claimed

And what did you decide from that post?

I see a contradiction. Fake claims are much more likely to get contradictions than real ones.  So I'm now leaning scum on nox. however I still have a few hundred more posts to read. (700 down)

OK, good. Thank you for pointing that out.



Wonktonodi on 06 August 2012
theprof00 said:
Baalzamon said:
pezus said:
theprof00 said:
This is why I removed my vote immediately at the beginning. I wasn't paying attention and joke voted. Thankfully day hadn't started yet.

Interesting prof. It is all so convenient, isn't it? Your votes have consequences, eh... might it be that you said that so we would not push you to vote for someone? What about linkz post about voteless being very unbalanced for this particular game? 

Well, in all reality Linkz point wasn't that strong.  With an odd # of players, it takes the same to vote somebody out but due to the rules, with an even number of players, it actually takes 1 less vote than a normal game to vote somebody out.  Contrary to what you are saying, some sort of limited voting role or something of that sort could easily seem plausible in this game.

Yeah thanks for noticing this. Linkz, please answer how my claim was bullshit mafia claim. You said "when j0 is enforcing 50% voting lynch". In actuality, it allows for town to be 3Mafia v 4Town with a voteless, and still lynch a mafia.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4705815

Nen then parrots Linkz without realizing that technically town is not handicapped at all with my voteless (especially considering that in a game of 14, town likely has an extra player, so for balance voteless makes sense)

Pezus and Mario also make points regarding voteless. Mario says "prove it" essentially, and pezus says "prof, what do you think about what linkz said about voteless being particularly unbalanced".

this seems ass backwards to me. with the 3 vs 4, the 3 townie votes wouldn't be a lynch. 3 out of 7 is not 50. You are voteless not a tree stump, you should still count for the total needed. Scum stops a lynch takes out someone with a vote at night and win next day 3 to 3 since town can't vote a scum off first with 2 votes.

If only 50% of the vote is needed and town already has one less vote, mafia can more easily lynch someone.

I do need to read much further but since I already have a scum vibe on you, adding this mess in makes me think we should lynch you so you won't be a liability latter.