By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 44 - Ghostbusters!

Final-Fan said:
You guys voting prof: I'm not saying I completely trust him, not even close, but Stefl is so inactive -- are you SO confident prof is scum that you'd rather lynch him than someone who's posted so little that he's almost not even playing the game?

Rather I am SO confident that Stefl is town that I'd rather lynch prof. Would've been good with your lynch too, but sadly nobody is going for either.



Around the Network
supermario128 said:
After Prof's more recent posts I am more inclined to believe his claim. A Monk would make sense as being someone who couldn't vote since they usually don't speak and the 50% vote rule actually goes along with a voteless player, like Baalz pointed out.

I don't want to end the day in another no lynch, but that might be better that getting a townie lynched. At any rate, it doesn't look like Stefl is ever going to post too much and he is usually mafia when he is actively lurking. He might be our best shot, imo. Also, I know I am jumping all over the place...

unvote: Prof

vote: Stefl

False. Stefl actually enjoys being mafia and is usually more active because of it.



Linkzmax said:

My bold is what's imba about 50%.

As for your underlined. You said you figured it out and it's me, nen, and mario. SAK had already flipped as scum. I may be bad at counting though.

I haven't decided if there are 3 or 4 mafia, nor so I think it matters in terms of mislynches since my pool of suspects could be lynched safely  in and order with a town victory regardless. 4 mafia with one being voteless would be pretty balanced though, no?

Wow at this whole post.



Linkzmax said:
supermario128 said:
After Prof's more recent posts I am more inclined to believe his claim. A Monk would make sense as being someone who couldn't vote since they usually don't speak and the 50% vote rule actually goes along with a voteless player, like Baalz pointed out.

I don't want to end the day in another no lynch, but that might be better that getting a townie lynched. At any rate, it doesn't look like Stefl is ever going to post too much and he is usually mafia when he is actively lurking. He might be our best shot, imo. Also, I know I am jumping all over the place...

unvote: Prof

vote: Stefl

False. Stefl actually enjoys being mafia and is usually more active because of it.

Just earlier you said we were headed into a no lynch at the rate we were going, and now with only very little time left, you choose not to vote for someone to give a lynch.

Every single other game you say that lynchign a town is better than no lynch, and now you're about to break that very rule.

Good show.



Stefl post your defense RIGHT NOW.



Around the Network
theprof00 said:
Stefl do us a favor and vote yourself, or consequently put up a defense because you're about to get lynched.

Where are the other two people that are going to come and vote Stefl?



theprof00 said:
Linkzmax said:
supermario128 said:
After Prof's more recent posts I am more inclined to believe his claim. A Monk would make sense as being someone who couldn't vote since they usually don't speak and the 50% vote rule actually goes along with a voteless player, like Baalz pointed out.

I don't want to end the day in another no lynch, but that might be better that getting a townie lynched. At any rate, it doesn't look like Stefl is ever going to post too much and he is usually mafia when he is actively lurking. He might be our best shot, imo. Also, I know I am jumping all over the place...

unvote: Prof

vote: Stefl

False. Stefl actually enjoys being mafia and is usually more active because of it.

Just earlier you said we were headed into a no lynch at the rate we were going, and now with only very little time left, you choose not to vote for someone to give a lynch.

Every single other game you say that lynchign a town is better than no lynch, and now you're about to break that very rule.

Good show.

I have NEVER advocated trying to lynch someone I think or know is town. AND having just reread round 29 last night, I DID say that no lynch is better than my mislynch.

Nice attempt.



Why no response to http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4707150 prof?

Is it because it destroys your whole argument? Awww, so sad.



Linkzmax said:
theprof00 said:
Linkzmax said:
supermario128 said:
After Prof's more recent posts I am more inclined to believe his claim. A Monk would make sense as being someone who couldn't vote since they usually don't speak and the 50% vote rule actually goes along with a voteless player, like Baalz pointed out.

I don't want to end the day in another no lynch, but that might be better that getting a townie lynched. At any rate, it doesn't look like Stefl is ever going to post too much and he is usually mafia when he is actively lurking. He might be our best shot, imo. Also, I know I am jumping all over the place...

unvote: Prof

vote: Stefl

False. Stefl actually enjoys being mafia and is usually more active because of it.

Just earlier you said we were headed into a no lynch at the rate we were going, and now with only very little time left, you choose not to vote for someone to give a lynch.

Every single other game you say that lynchign a town is better than no lynch, and now you're about to break that very rule.

Good show.

I have NEVER advocated trying to lynch someone I think or know is town. AND having just reread round 29 last night, I DID say that no lynch is better than my mislynch.

Nice attempt.

NO, every game you always say AS I DO, that a lynch is better than a no lynch. Because even in the risk of hitting a townie, we still get reads out of it.

Understand, sir, that right now you are removing all risk out of the equation. Stefl is a definite townie in your opinon.



You're going to make me find the post again so I can quote myself... -_-

Yep. If I'm wrong I'll even vote myself if I'm still around the next day. :)