Linkzmax said:
theprof00 said:
Linkzmax said:
supermario128 said: After Prof's more recent posts I am more inclined to believe his claim. A Monk would make sense as being someone who couldn't vote since they usually don't speak and the 50% vote rule actually goes along with a voteless player, like Baalz pointed out. I don't want to end the day in another no lynch, but that might be better that getting a townie lynched. At any rate, it doesn't look like Stefl is ever going to post too much and he is usually mafia when he is actively lurking. He might be our best shot, imo. Also, I know I am jumping all over the place... unvote: Prof vote: Stefl |
False. Stefl actually enjoys being mafia and is usually more active because of it.
|
Just earlier you said we were headed into a no lynch at the rate we were going, and now with only very little time left, you choose not to vote for someone to give a lynch.
Every single other game you say that lynchign a town is better than no lynch, and now you're about to break that very rule.
Good show.
|
I have NEVER advocated trying to lynch someone I think or know is town. AND having just reread round 29 last night, I DID say that no lynch is better than my mislynch.
Nice attempt.
|
NO, every game you always say AS I DO, that a lynch is better than a no lynch. Because even in the risk of hitting a townie, we still get reads out of it.
Understand, sir, that right now you are removing all risk out of the equation. Stefl is a definite townie in your opinon.