Well, if it's the case, then what's the problem?  I can only conclude you meant "not the case".  Unless I'm mistaken, two people had named non-suspects shortly before my post.  That is too early to say it's popular.  It might have been becoming popular.  Or so it seemed to me at the time.  

I don't often throw FoSes around.  Normally, I simply articulate my suspicions, and if one person is way ahead of the pack in that regard I'll vote them.  In this case, I wasn't prepared to vote him but I felt like pointing out that I felt as bad about him as I thought other people felt about the people they were FoSing at the time.  

Other than the fact that you trust nen and apparently believe I ought to share your opinion if I were town, I don't understand how the stuff you're talking about justifies your vote.  Do you really honestly think that stuff is a scum tell on me?  Or am I just someone to vote off because you don't have any better targets?  Surely in the latter case you could come up with a more worthy target if you thought a little harder.  Despite my warnings, I've so far been able to participate considerably more than, say, Stefl.  

Shit, Linkz, how many games have you played with me, and you think it's strange that I would use noncommital language here and there?  The more I think about this the more I want to call bullshit.  

Now I just have to decide if scum-Linkz would really push my lynch like this.  

theprof00 said:

Now FF-voters, explain to me why FF has become so much more interesting after he said "I don't like Linkz and Prof's discussion earlier, moreso Linkz"?

Waiting on my claim?

It was a rhetorical question, asking why townies would be more interested in my alignment than in asking Nen why he has now backed out of claiming mafia or town now THREE times (at the time it was only twice, but now, thrice).  I am far from suspicion save for vacuous allegations by spurge, so why is it that I must prove my towniness first before my contributions are appraised? Look at the evidence and check it, it's all in order.

So how exactly does claiming town make your "opinion" any more relevant?

You came in out of nowhere with:

After naming nen as your only person in your mafia list. Not, "hey nen refuses to claim town or human or any other stupid qualifier which I think means he must be town just for saying such a meaningless thing".  Why not make the argument first instead of asking the rhetorical?