Yesterday, you had a vote on SAK. You were looking for a lynch, understandably. I'd rather have a lynch as well.

Nen decided to vote for noc, and for some reason, you took your vote off of someone that you currently suspect, and put it on noc. Now, you say that your suspicion of me is "process of elimination". How does nen fare on this list?

Nen had a pretty quick turnaround from defending noc, to actively pushing for him, especially when I came in and said that one of them is likely a mafia, and specifically said nen and noc seemed linked. Nen was very quick to change his opinion of noc.

To me that was a red flag. Surely not something that immediately says "nen is mafia", but it definitely doesn't say "voting with nen is smart". Please share your thoughts.

You'd rather have a lynch? Yet other than the vote and quick unvote on radish, you never placed one.

Nen is in the "enough reason to believe" he is town list. That certainly could change bearing the events of today, but some research in the form of reading past threads may strengthen that even if today is on the quiet side.

I didn't care for motive. Didn't think the votes would come, as I said. But even if they did, I'd be happy not to read "PILLS" again.

Yep I didn't I said I was playing the way I was because town sucks, specifically noting that town sucks so bad that they don't even attempt to protect claimed powers.

If I'm town, I'm not "merely wrong". I'm not wrong at all. You are simply on a list of suspects that hasn't been yet removed. You haven't been "eliminated", but Radish has. I thought he was possible mafia. So let me correct myself, there are 5 people on my list.

Hmph. Only 3 people on your list? I assume yesterday it was 4, and with pezus, it would be 5? There are 14 players, leaving 8 question marks. You said that I am a suspect due to process of elimination, right? I'm sure you can see why'd I'd be confused with both statements when put together. Doesn't sound too "cool" to me, but it does sound like you're trying to give off that impression. Look, you can't even be bothered to interrogate your own suspect (me).

That's what I asked you. Why are you so intent on making me divulge my thoughts on it?

Oh, I should note Baalz isn't in my "enough reason" tier. He's in the same area as pezus, because I liked him early day 1, though not so much his stance on mario post-claim.

SAK is obviously a big lynch target or modkill possibility due to absenteeism. Other than that, it is midnight and I am tired. Thankfully, Day 2 is young because frankly this would still be my post if it was 12 hours ago instead of 2. Tomorrow I will be equally busy until evening or possibly later, but I will still make every effort to at least catch up once or twice and offer my opinions and suspects.

I can't articulate off the top of my head what I don't like about Linkz's posts (with prof) but I don't like him. It has nothing to do with his apparently undiminished suspicion of me. Although I wish he would believe I'm town if he's actually town, I don't think I have anything more to say about my first impressions of WiiBox which apparently constitutes the basis for his suspicion.

Let's get this straight. You WERE protected night 1 of round 41. You're surpised you weren't protected over the claimed cops?

Round 42, you had the ability yourself to make sure you couldn't be killed, even thinking there could be a strongman which would have made any attempts of protection pointless. You didn't use it.

Don't be so self-centered.

You have me in your list of suspects, which should mean you think I'm mafia. I'm not, ergo you are wrong about me at least. I could congratulate you on your suspicions of the other 4 if the mafia team is contained within them, but you haven't offered them.

Why do you mean only 3 on my list? Do you mean as town or as mafia? It reads as if you're talking about town, which is strange because you quote me saying I have reason enough to believe others are also town.

I am mocking you because I laughed when you asked me to tell you about yourself. It's a funny thing to ask. You are the one driving the question, not I.

I normally don't like saying who i DON'T suspect, but since I will be gone for so much of the day I should probably say that I would not participate in a lynch of spurge or pezus or prof given my current opinion of them (subject to change).

Who asked for your non-suspects?

Nobody tried to protect me round 42. It has nothing to do with the fact that I was lying, and that I could've protected myself. That has no relevance to the fact that town doesn't protect its powers.

Nope, you're simply in my list of people I can't decide on yet. There is one person in my mafia list, and that is Nen. You are 1 of 5 remaining, ergo, I am not wrong.

Let's go over this again, since it feels like you're starting to spin the conversation (not your fault, I'm just not very good at keeping things focussed). You have 4 people on your townie list. You suspect me because of process of elimination. Therefore, your townie list should be much bigger, otherwise there is no elimination. Get it? I will note that since I wrote the quoted, you've seeded that there exist "doubtfuls" before addressing the initial point directly, evidenced 6 posts up with nen and 4 posts up with Baalz.

OK, I'll let you go with saying you were just mocking me because when I asked you why you thought I was a suspect, it made you laugh.

Wow, I'd say enough bickering has occurred this round.

Host, what is going on with SAK, we don't need to waste a whole day talking about him. A replacement is always preferred over a lynch, but whatever is necessary (I don't think it would be too hard to find a replacement considering we aren't even 500 posts deep, with many of it as just personal bickering).