One can't accept anything from a Catholic website on the matter as being an unbiased source as it would no doubt be serving as apologetics.

But it's OK to accept something from Hitchens, despite the fact that he is clearly also not unbiased and also no doubt aiming to condemn the church?

Would you like a Jewish source, perhaps? Surely a Jewish source would be much more likely to be unbiased in this matter?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_Hitler's_Pope

Written by a Rabbi. Is that good enough?

Apparently Pope John Paul II thought that either the Catholics were responsible for or that they didn't do enough to stop the Holocaust as he issued an apology for it in 2000, and one Rabbi may have written the article you linked to; however, many others held Pope Pius XII responsible ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_Remember:_A_Reflection_on_the_Shoah and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_Nazi_Germany ).  However, it is true that most Mega Cults like the Catholic Church do have a knack for doing just enough to cover their rears in certain situations while maintaining quite contrary policies behind closed doors.

Yes, it is a cult.

Well it looks like the overwhelming consensus ~68% (a little over 37% think it is a dangerous cult, close to 31% think it is a cult but not a dangerous one, close to 28% think it's not a cult, and 4% weren't sure) is that Mormonism is a cult.

In my personal opinion, I don't think that America needs a cult member and in particular one that donates at least 4 million dollars a year to his cult as President because that most likely would lead to his cult having an undue influence in American politics in a country which is supposed to be founded on the principles of separation of church and state and individual liberty.

Some people pointed out that other people shouldn't refer to members of a cult as members of a cult as that might offend cult members. One can hope that if it offends cult members that the offense will help them reach the decision to leave the cult.

I can apply the exact same reasoning to almost every president America has ever had. After all, every denomination of Christianity is a cult, and almost every president has, at the least, claimed to be christian.

Let's admit it - the church (indeed, religion in general) has undue influence in American politics as it is.

That's true religion has an undue influence in America as it is.  To paraphrase the styxhexenhammer666 video I posted earlier and that is a further reason why we don't need the most dangerous cult in this hemisphere to gain even more control of the political process. 

It's no more dangerous than any of the others. Note that I didn't vote in the poll, because there was no option suiting my position.

It is certainly more dangerous than other ones.  It's been the guiding principle of the Mormon Church since the days of Joseph Smith and Bringham Young to become powerful enough to overthrow the United States of America and set up a Mormon Theocracy.  And, they've worked diligently towards this goal ever since first by instituting polygamy to swell their numbers so that they would have a sizeable population which is the core idea that they took from The Old Testament, then by aqcuiring their own state that they murdered other people in cold blood (  

to keep them out of, then doing away with polygamy for the sole reason that they couldn't become a state if they kept it

( although many members of the LDS hopes that it comes back some day and as pointed out in John Krakauer's book Under "The Banner of Heaven:  The Story of a Violent Faith"  

(     http://www.amazon.com/Under-Banner-Heaven-Story-Violent/dp/1400032806/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1340461022&sr=8-1&keywords=under+the+banner+of+heaven )  members of the FLDS church still practice polygamy in Utah and many times when District Attornies go after them for it, they're not re-elected to their next terms ); to the expansionist campaign that they practice today wherein they try to present a "Leave it to Beaver" image of Americana and Harmlessness to the outside world while at the same time they fire any professor at BYU that seeks to reveal elements of Mormon faith and history to other members of the church and the general public at large.  Plus unlike every other church in America, the Mormon faith has a long history of keeping tabs of the most minute elements of the lives of Mormons and Ex Mormons as Cult Researcher Richard Abanes points out in his book "One Nation Under Gods:  A History of the Mormon Church"  

( http://www.amazon.com/One-Nation-Under-Gods-History/dp/1568582838/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1340461373&sr=1-1&keywords=one+nation+under+gods ).

As Styxhexenhammer points out in his video on Mormonism

Mormonism is the most dangerous religious cult in the United States both due to its wealth and because most of its members are Fundamentalistly inclined whereas many members in other denominations have liberalized to a degree.

It remains the goal of Mormonism to use its influence politically and financially to guide events in America to a fulfillment of Joseph Smith's White Horse

Prophecy (

so that the Government of the United States becomes a Mormon Theocracy.

No less of an authority than the Yale Professor of Literature and Religious Studies Harold Bloom said in his book "The American Religion"

( http://www.amazon.com/The-American-Religion-Emergence-Post-Christian/dp/0671867377/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1340463151&sr=8-1&keywords=the+american+religion )

from the mid 1990s, "I tremble with fear for the day when a Mormon may become the President of the United States," and more recently about Mitt Romney, " A Romney Presidency would mean a strengthening of theocracy in America."

Yeah, that book doesnt talk about the lds religion, it talks about the flds, a completely separate religion that broke off from the main lds church back in the 1800s, the two religions are incredibly different.