RolStoppable said:
Paragraph by paragraph: If you were bulletproof, you wouldn't play quietly and casually, because that way you remain in the suspect pool of the town. Scum aims to eliminate players who cannot be set up for a mislynch. The way you have been playing this game so far, there was no reason to attempt to kill you, hence why there is no indication whatsoever that you are indeed bulletproof. Simply put, I don't believe your claim, but based on your history this doesn't necessarily make you scum. That's a good question. What reason would I have to lie about something like this? Why did the number of kills reduce from three on Night 1 to zero on Night 2? The answer to both questions is that I didn't lie about my claim. One reason why you flipped out after baalz's claim could be because you are a bad player. Maybe you were good once upon a time, but your recent track record is awful. In round 40 you redirected a lynch on the siblings and later on got yourself and mugen modkilled, because you thought he was a cult member. That's four townies you got killed and you were town in that game. In this round (42) you "promised" to never play Mafia again if mario flips town motivator. You keep being wrong about things. And the reason why baalz's claim didn't bother me is because I didn't think it's impossible to have unlynchable and unnightkillable town in one and the same game. The other theory is that you were really pissed that baalz is unlynchable after you were already jumping for joy that somebody who isn't on your team was going to get lynched on Day 1, but then didn't end up being dead. You then recommended that the vigilante may take care of baalz. Six people are dead, five of them are townies. 14 people are left and if we assume that there were six scum at the start of this game, it's nine townies vs. five scum now. Getting a townie lynched toDay could almost assure a scum victory, because with two anti-faction kills that hit townies on Night 3, it will be six townies vs. five scum on Day 4. Even if town lynchs scum every Day from there on out, it may not be enough to win this game, because the anti-factions can kill two people at Night. Also, I am a known power role of the town which is another incentive why lynching me would be worth it for you, even if it resulted in your own lynch somewhere down the line. I was assuming that you want to lynch me, because you gave me a strong impression that you are in the process of setting up a lynch. And lo and behold, you already voted for me. My quote is one of two hypothetical scenarios I wrote down. You playing a part in mario's mislynch is part of the "what if you are scum" scenario. Yet you made no efforts to draw a Night-kill. You pretty much kept being quiet the whole game which suggests the opposite of being bulletproof. You didn't want to draw a Night-kill. The only time you really drew attention was with the baalz thing early on Day 2 and that didn't give anyone a town vibe. Again, that's the opposite of what you would want to do if you are bulletproof. The more I think about it, the more I believe that you are scum. You were really pissed because baalz was unlynchable town and even more pissed when most people accepted the logical conclusion: That baalz is town. The only persons who still thought that baalz might be scum were kantor (prof's killer who is most likely not an insane doctor) and happyD whose logic is awful. I watched FF, but nobody was there. I picked FF because I didn't want to make the logical choice for myself on Night 2. If scum considered who I could possibly watch, then spurge and baalz would be my best targets. The former because he is a doctor, the latter because he has to be killed at some point. So I took my chance with FF because he is the best player left. Also because I thought I would most likely be the target of the Night-kills anyway and thus the chances that I would catch another killer in the act were low to begin with. I didn't share this information before, because I thought it wasn't valuable. I don't think it tells us anything important.
|
So when you called for no one to protect you, that's the proof that you were bullet proof and watcher, but me refusing to the idea of role claiming from the very beginning and my continuing insistance on not wanting to roleclaim makes me a liar, and you the honest one? Again, I'll ask. WHY ARE YOU LYING ABOUT BEING BULLETPROOF? I am bullet proof, not only do I know this because I am the bullet proof, but because I doubt you would have 2 abilities in this game. Other players with two abilities please raise your hand. When I was grilling you last night, you submitted to all my questions without once putting arguing against me. Even the responses, it took you almost 20 minutes for you to respond to each question. Discussing the matter with your scum friends? You were cautiously replying to my questions because you knew I didn't once believe your bullet proof claim. In fact, the reasons your answers were so small and precise (after 20 minutes each) because you didn't want to have to give any extra inormation. You already figured you fucked up with the second roleclaim, you at least didn't want cause any more slip-ups on your side.
How are you so sure you are the reason the kills were minimized? Because you are scum and your faction kill didn't go through? How are you so certain that kills were reduced because of you? What if a jailkeeper protected the right person? What if we have a protwon blocker? What if all killing factions all targeted the same person? Here's a better one, maybe they targeted me? I am the real bullet proof after all you liar.
Again referring to old games and petty insults as a means for argument. That was mentioned several times already last game and this game, and if you have to repeat game 40 to try to better your argument that's fine proof that you are grasping at straws. Mario's case ... what was that post you had back before his lynch, you know, right before you flipped flopped votes between Kantor Noctis WHEN you watched 2 people visit prof? Oh yeah, something like, "if you are town or scum, mario, your lesson learned is to not be obnoxius". You saw nothing wrong with his lynch and even jumped to vote him, you were wrong just as I was, yet because of this situation, you apply your double standards again and single me out? Why so adamant to pin mario's lynch on me? It's like you are guilty of it. Why do you keep bringing misc. info to try to convince everyone I'm lying when I have nothingto lie about? Now, the reason I doubted baalz (who seems much more towny by the second talking to you) was because of conflict of roles, something you would have expressed even at the slightest if you were the real bullet proof.
Hmm scum numbers, where is this coming from. Do you have a certain confirmation of the exact number of scum players because you are scum?
Here's another BIG question: Why did you role fish Radish? You say watxhed F-F... how convienient btw. But here http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4640132 and http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4640162 why are you actively role fishing for Jailkeeper? Why did you think you were protected in the first link? Why did you cover up your active fishingby saying "well if I saw it scum saw it"?
You know what I think you lying scum bastard, your night action didn't go through. Either your faction kill failed due to some kind of protection, or you were blocked.
I am the black sheep "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson