Ok, don't answer then. The reason I was asking was because I thought it should have been obvious for the doctor to target prof. But you didn't which means you didn't think prof was town.

So just tell me, did you think prof was town at the end of day 1?

Well, I got you two mixed up there. But I was also talking about this : -

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4635013  -  Rol's post

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4635060  -  Your post a couple of posts later.

Yeah, I kinda accidently mixed it up with a mafia faction... So that would be either mafia1 or mafia2 I guess, depending on the scenario...

Yeah, I don't think you've read what I've written. I've said it's FAR FETCHED! NOT the same thing as "doesn't match". Go back and read it like it's written.

And I wasn't the only one wanting him to name claim; I might have been the FIRST to want him to do it (can't remember), but I certainly wasn't the only one.

And how the Hell could this day end up with no lynch??? It's 12 hours til night fall, and we're no where near getting some one lynched. And to be honest, I couldn't choose between either of Kantor and Mario... Lynching one of them, and that person turned up town, actually wouldn't tell us anything! If we really want some answers we need to lynch Kantor, to see if he's insane or not. But is it worth it?!

Lynching Mario and he turns up town doesn't tell us anything about Kantor; he could either be scum or insane - which means we can't trust him to protect anyone anyway.

Lynching Kantor we MIGHT know if he's insane or not, and that could tell us something about Mario; if Kantor is sane Mario is scum. Easy as that.

For the sake of scum hunting we should lynch Kantor.
For the sake of the town we should lynch Mario (doctor being a more powerful/necessary role).

That's just my two cents.

I do agree with Radish - but the same goes for korrpi really... Could be a wasted lynch which would weaken the town.

The whole kantor/mario scenario revolves around the possible fact that wonk was killed by a vigilante. I thought about it and here is an alternate theory :

Smeags death :

During day 1, I observed that smeags was giving out hints about his character. Both pezus and kantor realized who smeags was, but prof (who knows GoT theme well) faked knowing nothing about it. I didn't buy it at that time, but I also thought maybe prof was trying to keep smeags identity safe? So I didn't pursue him.

And the next day prof flips scum and smeags flips town. I think it's safe to say that prof (or his team) killed smeags.

Wonk's death :

During day 1, wonk appeared shady, he didn't post much, and was like someone else said, like his mafia self. This definitely created a lot of suspicion on him, but at the end of day 1, the highest amount of suspicion was on Final-Fan, and also on Spurgeonryan because they hammered baalz thereby allowing no time for discussion. I don't think the vigilante killed wonk. The scum faction 2 knows that wonk is not in their team, and might have killed him as a result.

Prof's death :

Kantor says he protected prof because he thought prof was town. He has given an explanation for the protection (whereas mario just tells me to go back and read it). Assuming he is the insane doctor (which is big assumption) the townie who killed someone would have to be kantor.

I admit I thought about this scenario after all the discussion about insane doctor started up. If Wonk wasn't killed by the vigilante, then he has to be killed by scum. Smeags was definitely killed by prof's team. That means prof was killed by a townie, and kantor is the only one who has stepped forward.

Of course this theory assumes that both mario and kantor are what they are saying.

If the vigilante is one-shot, and has killed wonk, then he should step forward and say it to disprove this theory. Of course, if you are a jack of all trades then don't. Basically do not out yourself if you still have a night action left.

I went back and read it, it seems you are right. You said far-fetched.

I am now 100% sure Mario is scum. He starts off saying he is suspicious of me for defending prof, but then he also says I thought prof has a powerful role. The latter part he said on day 2 when everyone realized that prof was Cartel Flavour Cop. He had to twist my words to do this, and this is obviously what a scum does. This made me think he is scum not only because of the twisting, but also because mario's line of thinking for doubting me throughout day 1 was that I defended prof. Not that I thought he had any abilities.

Mario has been trying real bad at painting everyone who asks him anything as scum. This is basically, I believe, a move from him to deflect suspicion on him. People asking questions is now somewhat scummy to him. I would actually think people questioning me is a good thing because it helps us know who is much more probable to be town.

The only person he doesn't suspect who questioned him is Rol, who role-claimed later on. It's possible Mario wants everyone to role-claim and hence his HoS and FoS at everyone, as well as being suspicious of everyone who questions him. He also did support prof during his house-claim and didn't try to stop prof either, giving an excuse of an anti-town helping the discussion.

Combine all of this with his convenient role-claim of Motivator, whose effects we won't see on day 3 because he targeted prof(who is dead), and we will probably never see, I

vote : supermario128 

I think we could lynch vote out noctis... and again, I think you weren't paying attention to me again... because I said some time ago that I am going to reread because I was suspicious of him(which I never completed, because fuck you Firefox (no I am not pissed anymore, but I don't think after Noctis recent posts its that necessary to reread him)).